Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:43:29 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] send credit update during setting
 SO_RCVLOWAT
Message-ID: <ucmekzurgt3zcaezzdkk6277ukjmwaoy6kdq6tzivbtqd4d32b@izqbcsixgngk>
References: <20231211211658.2904268-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
 <20231212105423-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <d27f22f0-0f1e-e1bb-5b13-a524dc6e94d7@salutedevices.com>
 <20231212111131-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <7b362aef-6774-0e08-81e9-0a6f7f616290@salutedevices.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7b362aef-6774-0e08-81e9-0a6f7f616290@salutedevices.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:43:07PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 12.12.2023 19:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12.12.2023 18:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:16:54AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>                                DESCRIPTION
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset fixes old problem with hungup of both rx/tx sides and adds
>>>>> test for it. This happens due to non-default SO_RCVLOWAT value and
>>>>> deferred credit update in virtio/vsock. Link to previous old patchset:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/39b2e9fd-601b-189d-39a9-914e5574524c@sberdevices.ru/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Patchset:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I worry whether we actually need 3/8 in net not in net-next.
>>>
>>> Because of "Fixes" tag ? I think this problem is not critical and reproducible
>>> only in special cases, but i'm not familiar with netdev process so good, so I don't
>>> have strong opinion. I guess @Stefano knows better.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>> Fixes means "if you have that other commit then you need this commit
>> too". I think as a minimum you need to rearrange patches to make the
>> fix go in first. We don't want a regression followed by a fix.
>
>I see, ok, @Stefano WDYT? I think rearrange doesn't break anything, 
>because this
>patch fixes problem that is not related with the new patches from this patchset.

I agree, patch 3 is for sure net material (I'm fine with both 
rearrangement or send it separately), but IMHO also patch 2 could be.
I think with the same fixes tag, since before commit b89d882dc9fc 
("vsock/virtio: reduce credit update messages") we sent a credit update
for every bytes we read, so we should not have this problem, right?

So, maybe all the series could be "net".

Thanks,
Stefano