Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:24:01 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
        jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
        jack@suse.cz, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        ming.lei@redhat.com, jaswin@linux.ibm.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
        Prasad Singamsetty <prasad.singamsetty@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] fs/bdev: Add atomic write support info to statx
Message-ID: <20231213102401.epkxytqq7e5lskw2@quack3>
References: <20231212110844.19698-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
 <20231212110844.19698-4-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231212110844.19698-4-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 12-12-23 11:08:31, John Garry wrote:
> From: Prasad Singamsetty <prasad.singamsetty@oracle.com>
> 
> Extend statx system call to return additional info for atomic write support
> support if the specified file is a block device.
> 
> Add initial support for a block device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Singamsetty <prasad.singamsetty@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Just some nits below.

> +#define BDEV_STATX_SUPPORTED_MSK (STATX_DIOALIGN | STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC)
                                ^^^
				I believe saving one letter here is not
really beneficial so just spell out MASK here...

>  /*
> - * Handle STATX_DIOALIGN for block devices.
> - *
> - * Note that the inode passed to this is the inode of a block device node file,
> - * not the block device's internal inode.  Therefore it is *not* valid to use
> - * I_BDEV() here; the block device has to be looked up by i_rdev instead.
> + * Handle STATX_{DIOALIGN, WRITE_ATOMIC} for block devices.
>   */

Please keep "Note ..." from the above comment (or you can move the note in
front of blkdev_get_no_open() if you want).

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR