Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Message-ID: <6579d3df.050a0220.41f9b.a309@mx.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:55:08 +0100
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        David Epping <david.epping@missinglinkelectronics.com>,
        Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@amd.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package
 MMD read/write
References: <20231213105730.1731-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20231213105730.1731-3-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <ZXnSB4YsuWZ0vdj2@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZXnSB4YsuWZ0vdj2@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:47:19PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:57:30AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Some PHY in PHY package may require to read/write MMD regs to correctly
> > configure the PHY package.
> > 
> > Add support for these additional required function in both lock and no
> > lock variant.
> > 
> > It's assumed that the entire PHY package is either C22 or C45. We use
> > C22 or C45 way of writing/reading to mmd regs based on the passed phydev
> > whether it's C22 or C45.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> 
> I don't recall what has been said in previous postings of this, but
> introducing new helpers without an example user is normally frowned
> upon. The lack of cover message for this three patch series also
> doesn't help (the cover message could explain why there's no users
> being proposed with this addition of helpers.)
>

These are prereq for the qca803x PHY driver and the PHY package series.

I can move this single patch in those series, but it was suggested to
move these simple change to a separate patch to lower the patch number
since they were orthogonal to the PHY package series proposal.

-- 
	Ansuel