Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Feedback-ID: i21f147d5:Fastmail
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:18:28 -0700
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
        lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen <tandersen@netflix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pidfd: allow pidfd_open() on non-thread-group
 leaders
Message-ID: <ZXoDhLkWJB5HM1i/@tycho.pizza>
References: <20231207170946.130823-1-tycho@tycho.pizza>
 <202312111516.26dc3fd5-oliver.sang@intel.com>
 <20231213-famos-chillen-41adc67ac0ef@brauner>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231213-famos-chillen-41adc67ac0ef@brauner>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:18:03PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 03:28:09PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.pidfd.pidfd_test.fail" on:
> > 
> > commit: e6d9be676d2c1fa8332c63c4382b8d3227fca991 ("[PATCH v2 1/3] pidfd: allow pidfd_open() on non-thread-group leaders")
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tycho-Andersen/selftests-pidfd-add-non-thread-group-leader-tests/20231208-011135
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231207170946.130823-1-tycho@tycho.pizza/
> > patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] pidfd: allow pidfd_open() on non-thread-group leaders
> > 
> > in testcase: kernel-selftests
> > version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-60acb023-1_20230329
> > with following parameters:
> > 
> > 	group: pidfd
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > compiler: gcc-12
> > test machine: 36 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz (Cascade Lake) with 32G memory
> > 
> > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312111516.26dc3fd5-oliver.sang@intel.com
> > 
> > 
> > besides, we also observed kernel-selftests.pidfd.pidfd_poll_test.fail on this
> > commit, but clean on parent:
> > 
> > bee0e7762ad2c602 e6d9be676d2c1fa8332c63c4382
> > ---------------- ---------------------------
> >        fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
> >            |             |             |
> >            :6          100%           6:6     kernel-selftests.pidfd.pidfd_poll_test.fail
> >            :6          100%           6:6     kernel-selftests.pidfd.pidfd_test.fail
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > TAP version 13
> > 1..7
> > # timeout set to 300
> > # selftests: pidfd: pidfd_test
> > # TAP version 13
> > # 1..8
> > # # Parent: pid: 2191
> > # # Parent: Waiting for Child (2192) to complete.
> > # # Child (pidfd): starting. pid 2192 tid 2192
> > # # Child Thread: starting. pid 2192 tid 2193 ; and sleeping
> > # # Child Thread: doing exec of sleep
> > # Bail out! pidfd_poll check for premature notification on child thread exec test: Unexpected epoll_wait result (c=0, events=0) (errno 0)
> 
> So it seems that this broke multi-threaded exit notifications.

Yeah... I've been trying to figure out how to fix it.

de_thread() calls release_task() for the original leader, which I
didn't realize.

Tycho