Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:16:28 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
Message-ID: <20071206081628.GA15868@parisc-linux.org>
References: <20071205064116.D849BDE10A@ozlabs.org> <1196911347.7033.15.camel@pasglop> <20071206063940.GA16474@kroah.com> <1196927934.7033.39.camel@pasglop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1196927934.7033.39.camel@pasglop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1124
Lines: 24

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I was just hoping somebody had a better idea, like a way to add a new
> format specifier to printk without losing gcc type checking :-)

It's been discussed before.  Some of the solutions discussed:

 - Add something like PRI_RES which can be concatenated into a printk.
   Ugly.
 - Patch gcc to allow user-definable types.  I think OpenBSD has a patch
   for this.  Then we have to get that patch propagated to all the
   people who compile the kernel.  Unappetising.
 - Disable gcc's printk checking, teach sparse to typecheck printk.
   Most people don't run sparse yet.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/