Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:06:53 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
        rafael@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
        rui.zhang@intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the
 scheduler
Message-ID: <20231214053653.hnyeormwu42un5sc@vireshk-i7>
References: <20231212142730.998913-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <20231212142730.998913-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <2e8807b68133f4b3a72227122a9d9a05f3fbf9d8.camel@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2e8807b68133f4b3a72227122a9d9a05f3fbf9d8.camel@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 13-12-23, 16:41, Tim Chen wrote:
> Seems like the pressure value computed from the first CPU applies to all CPU.
> Will this be valid for non-homogeneous CPUs that could have different
> max_freq and max_capacity?

The will be part of different cpufreq policies and so it will work
fine.

-- 
viresh