Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8d10:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id bj16csp5839643rdb; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:32:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGAItq72Uo6Yk4mEicaPBoKcnw/SpzHzQ1s/IKbbB0hVAnVM6AkTJIv52V0RN4zZyTSyG37 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11d0:b0:1d0:a084:b002 with SMTP id q16-20020a17090311d000b001d0a084b002mr5090002plh.68.1702542722363; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:32:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1702542722; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uNSzFpb7phHONR5nwRyrEb6ob0lc/2CcfLb/oYmSoWtLdw1Na/uu8U3DD9eOX4IPwY 3iODhiEBLowF2mdzgbM5q7f/jD8lJNuTccSud80bfIET7REeVcth++Tf7cGoNA1QIqlC rUGQcXv4bWiz0CkURHGYkYOe23p6OnNudz/Hnrjj60/mhD7yX4566zZe0MCKVSeFs4qR ZTyYxbjigwhoN64HEFaATboiH0LvqZKhByZOPoTkA+plmtdOPtToOztW6MH7Wv82eHqK LgAF5F24BOaEn2/MEihvsZS3MXrhzzWjdOfSy0kjKe6YqflMXZtG0cHSuNFBdCORPZjc 9rIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=OR6LNIAn/KSv3UmwJs2xcNQMCQUGb+YLiYLHEm62vj4=; fh=gsmDeGlmTG8lCv21YkMkZyCZWdICEgNVe2njF0T+MIU=; b=ycp1uQVqpi0aS3dksqdkGgnpF62qz6WniSK+tot6dlSS7hmNtC1Kw4qCO34bzCJbHt 2RAYeYHhyo+9yL1Sn2WthXAnEm3dCcH7Ev4iTvs2vZ3JZ390pZu+8e0LE+ZEpY0qrsxs kBTjyikGlumSFvK3bOc1RjLuchDTA4/HsAs11J+GhTApzcx3CgU/Ey9I9esam5MzErXA guFF8Jc/XPAO9AEuh9r+BcYgmdlCcGHsl3Fk5bRevz/HmSlwQHiK6VOur2XAuI2vZcZX kXjWzoBL29LlSH3CGrhBM3kwSGhdU1Kl+U+zzlXmHleriTsnW8CKiUEpYFpItC/c91ZE 070A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from howler.vger.email (howler.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ju18-20020a170903429200b001d0c1a225b3si2644617plb.185.2023.12.14.00.32.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by howler.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644F582FA572; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:31:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at howler.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235605AbjLNIbo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:31:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234448AbjLNIbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:31:33 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CC812A; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:31:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021BEC15; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.85.242] (unknown [10.57.85.242]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3249B3F5A1; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:31:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2c2fad2b-89ce-437e-96b3-f06e6f99639f@arm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:32:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Rework system pressure interface to the scheduler Content-Language: en-US To: Vincent Guittot Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, vschneid@redhat.com, bristot@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, bsegall@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org References: <20231212142730.998913-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <47b4cbcb-d33d-4699-a148-0108cf734e23@arm.com> From: Lukasz Luba In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on howler.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (howler.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:31:59 -0800 (PST) On 12/14/23 08:29, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 09:21, Lukasz Luba wrote: >> >> Hi Vincent, >> >> I've been waiting for this feature, thanks! >> >> >> On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote: >>> Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie >>> reworks how the scheduler gets the pressures on CPUs. We need to take into >>> account all pressures applied by cpufreq on the compute capacity of a CPU >>> for dozens of ms or more and not only cpufreq cooling device or HW >>> mitigiations. we split the pressure applied on CPU's capacity in 2 parts: >>> - one from cpufreq and freq_qos >>> - one from HW high freq mitigiation. >>> >>> The next step will be to add a dedicated interface for long standing >>> capping of the CPU capacity (i.e. for seconds or more) like the >>> scaling_max_freq of cpufreq sysfs. The latter is already taken into >>> account by this serie but as a temporary pressure which is not always the >>> best choice when we know that it will happen for seconds or more. >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231211104855.558096-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/ >>> >>> Vincent Guittot (4): >>> cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler >>> sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account >>> thermal/cpufreq: Remove arch_update_thermal_pressure() >>> sched: Rename arch_update_thermal_pressure into >>> arch_update_hw_pressure >>> >>> arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 6 +-- >>> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 6 +-- >>> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 26 ++++----- >>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 4 +- >>> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 3 -- >>> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 8 +-- >>> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 10 ++++ >>> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 8 +-- >>> .../{thermal_pressure.h => hw_pressure.h} | 14 ++--- >>> include/trace/events/sched.h | 2 +- >>> init/Kconfig | 12 ++--- >>> kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +-- >>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 ++++++++++--------- >>> kernel/sched/pelt.c | 18 +++---- >>> kernel/sched/pelt.h | 16 +++--- >>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +- >>> 17 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) >>> rename include/trace/events/{thermal_pressure.h => hw_pressure.h} (55%) >>> >> >> I would like to test it, but something worries me. Why there is 0/5 in >> this subject and only 4 patches? > > I removed a patch from the series but copied/pasted the cover letter > subject without noticing the /5 instead of /4 OK > >> >> Could you tell me your base branch that I can apply this, please? > > It applies on top of tip/sched/core + [1] > and you can find it here: > https://git.linaro.org/people/vincent.guittot/kernel.git/log/?h=sched/system-pressure Thanks for the info and handy link.