Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:10:23 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        brgl@bgdev.pl, linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpiolib: cdev: reduce locking in
 gpio_desc_to_lineinfo()
Message-ID: <ZXsa39xneH6Rh7Gd@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231214095814.132400-1-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <20231214095814.132400-5-warthog618@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231214095814.132400-5-warthog618@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:58:13PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> Reduce the time holding the gpio_lock by snapshotting the desc flags,
> rather than testing them individually while holding the lock.
> 
> Accept that the calculation of the used field is inherently racy, and
> only check the availability of the line from pinctrl if other checks
> pass, so avoiding the check for lines that are otherwise in use.

...

> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);

Shouldn't this be covered by patch 1 (I mean conversion to scoped_guard()
instead of spinlock)?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko