Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1702467945-38866-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
 <1702467945-38866-2-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20231213222415.GA13818@breakpoint.cc> <0e94149a-05f1-3f98-3f75-ca74f364a45b@linux.alibaba.com>
 <CAADnVQJx7j_kB6PVJN7cwGn5ETjcSs2Y0SuBS0+9qJRFpMNv-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <e6d9b59f-9c98-53a1-4947-720095e0c37e@linux.alibaba.com> <CAADnVQK5JP3D+BrugP61whZX1r1zHp7M_VLSkDmCKF9y96=79A@mail.gmail.com>
 <3c1f3b68-f1fc-495c-5430-ba7bc7339619@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c1f3b68-f1fc-495c-5430-ba7bc7339619@linux.alibaba.com>
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:02:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLJ3XkZMQDdMGOcKUqK8xuFHcc1+74o6RrzfzeZo7v28A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC nf-next 1/2] netfilter: bpf: support prog update
To:     "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        coreteam@netfilter.org,
        netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 7:56=E2=80=AFAM D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com=
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/14/23 9:37 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > yes. it's and it's working as expected. Do you see an issue?
>
> Hi Alexei,
>
> I see the issue here is that bpf_nf_link has not yet implemented
> prog_update,
> which just simply returned -EOPNOTSUPP right now.

I see. The commit log didn't make it clear.
Yes. That would be good to support.