Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8d10:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id bj16csp6269925rdb; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:12:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHWiq7yczjfKm2ErI2C3EN0iHzXWKf/fJquVxOUujeLVUa9z9Ar0xmhxIR1rk9XqbsPKM08 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:86:b0:a1f:99e1:8a5e with SMTP id 6-20020a170906008600b00a1f99e18a5emr3483299ejc.14.1702588323467; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:12:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1702588323; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CoRWZ8WhXkVCr7q6BUPRcss5690AyEZK+02fcfkowMxIAp4qB7/Vl7gwfOSr7fK4N5 E2BAao+lEGft7F6l4/KDqy+oZT/YCA05YLdAQrYlUwHkjOFt0L8Xgq7oKvBoGi3MGXMS /pc2iU23Z3/j5JTHxPDudE1cdf064p5wzOG3YjG/JR+bjLV7e3PViiukHAaHmKFVlHXL EEQi84qRMCZNfDiC3aAlWzfF/dOk6QNrHf8eMIZ/hK19SDT1xyeLgUfzxkLtis3Qwlg8 S5VHmcJ4MgRgx2Vf5erC6rOmcKud4xpDowFpb0+O0xF/6pTKLVB4h93ev2uDOip0g4r6 j6Ag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature :dkim-signature:from; bh=uSvaVuzRrYUFxbGHasdwEk5ZlSQOIF9rp0WttitjT6c=; fh=Ic2i/t2OgWJ5/GUcxRkiYi+J++9KimARLae+5GnKyPA=; b=VcPrwqwNeRRToR3zb31NF06B4gIWdTJ+NsNO+/nPuGajpTo6Zu2yV1BIKjZxflldV3 uk0o/DPNlDbGDi03R83ZKjcm27/fQNQZ8YBixc8fF/SgKEnj/0vcV9QCs833ZzT14Jw9 Y2D2O9n+RE7sfOOGX61BjVDiyd1RFNPr21BNmki+5YFUF9RUqiiePhQhKjulEYn7uPOb KwKXOz3xzpHZ1RslLmsOyCcH9FYeyVHuffbUmeN2X8XQDdRPTr72nyUdskpzyg1mDFR7 2zJVPDBluDNTF/mJrKRddNV7JlXUDGFxjlJcMMy8dcsRPL/UoBr3xZYFiB6O+4i+n9iX 50Hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=DAYVSkci; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="KgZxg3/J"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-115-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-115-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6-20020a1709061c4600b00a2312be59ecsi461156ejg.1048.2023.12.14.13.12.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-115-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=DAYVSkci; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="KgZxg3/J"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-115-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-115-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389AC1F22633 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 21:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE3E54277; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="DAYVSkci"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="KgZxg3/J" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4070A2BCF6; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 21:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1702588305; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uSvaVuzRrYUFxbGHasdwEk5ZlSQOIF9rp0WttitjT6c=; b=DAYVSkcizitZKRh1T9LSbw+7SfRNAUkpkrOKx9CAflfTLt0Mo8rXNrXojveiRlRYUiRz21 JbY7gGpDhSBHFssQv09M7R72LxhRQWyTziNFCJWLo2L1yyQbTT0/YZ/AM64+AXtLYwEbiY zemeXy9ZVTt1hUsOC1IdKtg/fRYPCiZYK+CyDh6EqlLZiYJj+Gw8KcFnNb8+u6TLLblGWd 1yoZ2WJ5PLi05gPG91LFICnD7Ict0/vYV4ZQs+aU78sTpY4p+gDNMRjZv8LwNodzxmuFaS /+7fIKMa9elxkJJog6YEbSu+KnLwT2+HuJ9jU9j4jxLyL43A5jh81vvx3WDMPA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1702588305; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uSvaVuzRrYUFxbGHasdwEk5ZlSQOIF9rp0WttitjT6c=; b=KgZxg3/JgA/dzaNvOMsoOVtanpDB76qq/4Zsg5RJ3YQp8QxNAdUWwJftOYi52FlYOdTtDB IHv+ND5Htc/jB0Bw== To: "Zhang, Rui" , "jsperbeck@google.com" , "tip-bot2@linutronix.de" Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "andres@anarazel.de" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/acpi: Ignore invalid x2APIC entries In-Reply-To: <378afe31b40b94fbb9096832bf47055c27fa8638.camel@intel.com> References: <87ttonpbnr.ffs@tglx> <878r5yp357.ffs@tglx> <378afe31b40b94fbb9096832bf47055c27fa8638.camel@intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:11:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzpgo5f3.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Dec 14 2023 at 15:00, Zhang, Rui wrote: > On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 15:51 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> The topology evaluation rework gets rid of this return value >> completely, >> so I really don't want to add an dependency on it. > > Great to know that the topology evaluation rework is still in your > plan. We have tested the latest version and it indeed solves some real > issues we observed, and I'm willing to test if we have a new version > posted. If I ever get a breather :)