Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755152AbXLFUFH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:05:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752219AbXLFUE4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:04:56 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:45092 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754036AbXLFUEz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:04:55 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:38:43 PST." <20071206193843.GA25125@kroah.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <3941.1196941764@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20071206040420.6c89c675.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4374.1196968688@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20071206193843.GA25125@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1196971465_2829P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: <7466.1196971465@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 45 --==_Exmh_1196971465_2829P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:38:43 PST, Greg KH said: > > Would I be remiss in hypothesising that something in gregkh-driver-kobject-* > > changed something, and now we need a agk-dm-dm-kobject-fixupage.patch? > > I don't know, it all depends on what is in the dm patches. Hopefully > everything that I have changed will manifest with a build breakage to > obviously detect that something needs to be fixed up. > > But I've been known to mess things up that I didn't intend to :) Given that it *didn't* totally break the build, it's likely a fencepost error or some similar issue... > If there's anything that I can do to test this, please let me know. I wanted to give a heads-up, in case there was a D'Oh! patch hiding. At worst, I just need another 6 or 7 bisects to figure out which of those 120-ish patches is the culprit. With luck I'll end up stopped on a patch that in retrospect was obviously busticated. If not, we'll have to apply the usual more drastic measures. If you don't have a box that's already demonstrating it, and you don't have any obvious candidates, it's likely that the most productive use of everybody's time is for you to chase down any other kobject issues while I bisect the problem down further... --==_Exmh_1196971465_2829P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHWFXJcC3lWbTT17ARApgEAJ9pJDSM7zZqycRF0neS4dgz9JOnAgCfUyh8 MgzWo8mGixxHoRSnzFCNNh0= =TOhE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1196971465_2829P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/