Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755156AbXLFWBQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:01:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752592AbXLFWA6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:00:58 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:45686 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750873AbXLFWA5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:00:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:00:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, apiszcz@solarrain.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.23.9 / P35 Chipset + WD 750GB Drives (reset port) Message-Id: <20071206140038.f06e18ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3390 Lines: 81 On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:26:08 -0500 (EST) Justin Piszcz wrote: > I am putting a new machine together and I have dual raptor raid 1 for the > root, which works just fine under all stress tests. > > Then I have the WD 750 GiB drive (not RE2, desktop ones for ~150-160 on > sale now adays): > > I ran the following: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sde > > (as it is always a very good idea to do this with any new disk) > > And sometime along the way(?) (i had gone to sleep and let it run), this > occurred: > > [42880.680144] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4010000 > action 0x2 frozen Gee we're seeing a lot of these lately. > [42880.680231] ata3.00: irq_stat 0x00400040, connection status changed > [42880.680290] ata3.00: cmd ec/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb > 0x0 data 512 in > [42880.680292] res 40/00:ac:d8:64:54/00:00:57:00:00/40 Emask 0x10 > (ATA bus error) > [42881.841899] ata3: soft resetting port > [42885.966320] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > [42915.919042] ata3.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) > [42915.919094] ata3.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x5) > [42915.919149] ata3.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5) > [42915.919206] ata3: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs > [42920.912458] ata3: hard resetting port > [42926.411363] ata3: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status > 0x80) > [42930.943080] ata3: COMRESET failed (errno=-16) > [42930.943130] ata3: hard resetting port > [42931.399628] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > [42931.413523] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133 > [42931.413586] ata3: EH pending after completion, repeating EH (cnt=4) > [42931.413655] ata3: EH complete > [42931.413719] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] 1465149168 512-byte hardware sectors > (750156 MB) > [42931.413809] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off > [42931.413856] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > [42931.413867] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: > enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA > > Usually when I see this sort of thing with another box I have full of > raptors, it was due to a bad raptor and I never saw it again after I > replaced the disk that it happened on, but that was using the Intel P965 > chipset. > > For this board, it is a Gigabyte GSP-P35-DS4 (Rev 2.0) and I have all of > the drives (2 raptors, 3 750s connected to the Intel ICH9 Southbridge). > > I am going to do some further testing but does this indicate a bad drive? > Bad cable? Bad connector? > > As you can see above, /dev/sdc stopped responding for a little bit and > then the kernel reset the port. > > Why is this though? What is the likely root cause? Should I replace the > drive? Obviously this is not normal and cannot be good at all, the idea > is to put these drives in a RAID5 and if one is going to timeout that is > going to cause the array to go degraded and thus be worthless in a raid5 > configuration. > > Can anyone offer any insight here? It would be interesting to try 2.6.21 or 2.6.22. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/