Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-853-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e2b943eca92abebbf035447b3569f09a7176c770.1702366951.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <1c03eb18-a6ac-45c8-8fea-46097bb4e132@gmail.com> <CANiq72=mvca8PXoxwzSao+QFbAHDCecSKCDtV+ffd+YgZNFaww@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231215064823.ltm55fk4zclsuuwq@vireshk-i7> <a2aca039-7360-476e-a1b1-e950698cd26b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a2aca039-7360-476e-a1b1-e950698cd26b@gmail.com>
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:35:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72mT_N0eSkUAR9KYYWvFaVNYYOpFiJLr_whab=FNFcMVhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] docs: rust: Clarify that 'rustup override' applies to
 build directory
To: Tiago Lam <tiagolam@gmail.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, 
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:14=E2=80=AFPM Tiago Lam <tiagolam@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>
> I think we can drop the reference to the `--path <buildir>` to avoid
> giving too much information to the users following the guide. It doesn't
> seem to bring anything given users should now always go through `make
> rustupoverride`.

Yeah, the idea with the new target was to simplify this, rather than
have it as an additional way.

> But if I understood this correctly, the point here is that with the new
> target we can now abstract both cases behind the `make rustupoverride`
> target - i.e. we don't need to provide alternatives.

Exactly.

Cheers,
Miguel