Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8d10:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id bj16csp6791179rdb; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFw1tMRCc3UYvblLvFYwwPQnMxq32IjySTHyk9BFMIXphm1taGdhk4P09a7NzCDGcMD6st1 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:e84:b0:67e:feb1:b0b3 with SMTP id hf4-20020a0562140e8400b0067efeb1b0b3mr6188890qvb.21.1702657380526; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1702657380; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wg0xlZUH+kUv3uxuyPLuDRXNfHez+BtG5tCNWqJdpiaq25qKVZ770TtXFhz1BTq8uU B10HqxlcCHpSfHbolD4tE+YqbjspvpQ93vkDSmDExmZBY6WtNrHqfyF6DUTN7nyAA7gU KO/HAGJ1DGSAF520sp2PqA99HoBTeOafnMMf0bJveg4Zx4tDBq/Ofswy9XSQZULHTwoZ hG0k5GgUJirBNonWg5FVPbc1/OOo5mb/wE1QimqNX3nN/bUk/JXfltYhEApELpndeQDu rLQ1yEgQiVDeJD/MdLe2Lv2Ei39Fw4/WhoOAHz0g1y7fBfboNZ2GEd9uS99WBAujaTbz q3EA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=bXFaUUiRsPpnS2Vp5CCTF+5PWB7QcTAd36YeqdDaGDM=; fh=tQx+cReByIvlhNFFMDBT5cDtgWuDht0qE8IwbzXldqk=; b=meYDB9frOXeO73RvXEBNH80wJrOWgCKu0rqmbomRboNFLqxqD0gBwKV7Q5vIlvzJDx yWwRrWS+hOD/Inhzbhs3Y5zsp02ckj7yU6mkPqnkGCWTI3FqQV8aEqAw8m17abRKmhPp cQqnc1zjHSemcJnpvdIsCX0vhRvB2tlTEMt80NvLs4m9SyyYOnatDc9gYsyc2/636FAD 7CddMDLTJCqNyGJy4Y0n3WpiON2Usjg++xwOQJECHRWIom/YN/vAqQt0vomqmIFYnA44 KH5agKI9/ppz7GzaubPJbxvhg7w7p1rqbQzNkzr2Za6mlQWDJxZpB+gvoX7SyWnxpb7j gJsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="M6Y6/Zbh"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-1286-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-1286-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d26-20020a05620a167a00b0077dcfd8a0cfsi17429536qko.607.2023.12.15.08.23.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-1286-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="M6Y6/Zbh"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-1286-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-1286-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD7B1C23A3A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193AA3BB30; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="M6Y6/Zbh" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com [209.85.208.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C7A3BB31; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cc4029dc6eso10204371fa.1; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:22:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702657370; x=1703262170; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bXFaUUiRsPpnS2Vp5CCTF+5PWB7QcTAd36YeqdDaGDM=; b=M6Y6/ZbhKE2sfdW34rrJ01McECRlyCJ4iplt7+WxA4j8FlgAUYQmAdnambb/3CkPkv owTLtOZ2H4DGneJL55gDrrFzPiA3mgCULD1wHgud3KnU8yGj7XHCTNWf6HJ43XuQZbud jQhDNY4LNz+bOhposBQSkul9VpQKcHagSe7ZsqLVZkuNifZTnMEjg48cV6NGoClTYjDf 3cLYeW0l7LoON1+7oJ+aq226FQlBrtiATAF55qA+ym4JTXSl5HfY7ojf8SY7Vrd5cVqf MQpO4Hf/T6QXBesqjj12kVjeyji7WENj4AykDfWCLyOIjUlwmcLTqwSMpgkgGBH51V6Y vcOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702657370; x=1703262170; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bXFaUUiRsPpnS2Vp5CCTF+5PWB7QcTAd36YeqdDaGDM=; b=mpNe//a2ZEiNDLX8HHay9f08/EusdolMBSvjpvtf2SJQ6wEY03NLtO5LvmDjoHarKB luuCbgNlwZcrFaiUuNTEItDsWK+6aXBpmF/16K6Rs0VpmryUCrLXuI+vknbpujzMo9PR pvNNI9twYDrmPXwqtXR1HYHM2BAIdFX47yYKpPmfnp9Gpok8HmK6e6rezLJF1n3/inph OK0HBTYG9K+oAkPF4WEJ1rLFdaYs3Cd7deHaONMR2+2MQ3WJ3vNCr9ruiLtQzTWBKWuQ VUEhKZTrvtADSDIqRNi8jb7PFKpi4uoH242rL8h2NU/xY1PsWkDukqRXwxFlvNqZRU8I X8xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzag8dYQ4fC46g2nCXzMKr/Ruj0jWm4H57nEQFhbWnxwwxJdUQv VOe5wVOVL8am+zQWx0EWP9g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31d2:b0:50e:154e:d7ad with SMTP id j18-20020a05651231d200b0050e154ed7admr2235331lfe.79.1702657369518; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:22:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (host-176-36-0-241.b024.la.net.ua. [176.36.0.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mb8-20020a170906eb0800b00a1de512fa1fsm10832774ejb.186.2023.12.15.08.22.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:22:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <149715b52bdd9ec9453a8a817d8339bd1a86a4f7.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bug Report] bpf: incorrectly pruning runtime execution path From: Eduard Zingerman To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Hao Sun , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , bpf , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:22:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <480a5cfefc23446f7c82c5b87eef6306364132b9.camel@gmail.com> <917DAD9F-8697-45B8-8890-D33393F6CDF1@gmail.com> <9dee19c7d39795242c15b2f7aa56fb4a6c3ebffa.camel@gmail.com> <73d021e3f77161668aae833e478b210ed5cd2f4d.camel@gmail.com> <526d4ac8f6788d3323d29fdbad0e0e5d09a534db.camel@gmail.com> <2b49b96de9f8a1cd6d78cc5aebe7c35776cd2c19.camel@gmail.com> <66b2a6c45045c207d8452ad3b5786a9dc0082d79.camel@gmail.com> Autocrypt: addr=eddyz87@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 nYzhLWGcczc6J71q1Dje0l5vIPaSFOgwmWD4DA+WvuxM/shH4rtWeodbv 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 t1iq+gsfnXbPz5AnS598ScZI1oP7OrPSFJkt/z4acEbOQDQs8aUqrd46PV jsdqGvKnXZxzylux29UTNby4jTlz9pNJM+wPrDRmGfchLDUmf6CffaUYCbu4FiId+9+dcTCDvxbABRy1C3OJ8QY7cxfJ+pEZW18fRJ0XCl/fiV/ecAOfB3HsqgTzAn555h0rkFgay0hAvMU/mAW/CFNSIxV397zm749ZNLA0L2dMy1AKuOqH+/B+/ImBfJMDjmdyJQ8WU/OFRuGLdqOd2oZrA1iuPIa+yUYyZkaZfz/emQwpIL1+Q4p1R/OplA4yc301AqruXXUcVDbEB+joHW3hy5FwK5t5OwTKatrSJBkydSF9zdXy98fYzGniRyRA65P0Ix/8J3BYB4edY2/w0Ip/mdYsYQljBY0A== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 21:20 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: [...] > > > can we detect that any register link is broken and force checkpoint h= ere? > >=20 > > Should be possible. I'll try this in the morning and check veristat res= ults. {still working on this} > > By the way, I added some stats collection for find_equal_scalars() and = see > > the following results when run on ./test_progs: > > - maximal number of registers with same id per call: 3 > > - average number of registers with same id per call: 1.4 >=20 > What if we keep 8 extra bytes in jump/instruction history and encode > up to 8 linked registers/slots: >=20 > 1. 1 bit to mark whether it's a src_reg set, or dst_reg set > 2. 1 bit to mark whether it's a stack slot or register > 3. 6 bits (0..63 values) to record register or slot number >=20 > If we ever need more than 8 linked registers, we can just forcefully > some "links" by resetting some IDs? That should work as well. Probably don't need src/dst bit, as backtracker marks both as precise when processing conditional jump. You mean "just forcefully [breaking] some "links" by resetting ...", right? > BTW, is it only conditional jumps that need to record this linked > register sets? Did we previously discuss why we don't need this for > any other operation? Don't think that we discussed it. Here is my reasoning: the range transfer happens at find_equal_scalars() which is called only from check_cond_jmp_op(). I think there are no other effects IDs have for scalar values. Thus, covering conditional jumps seems sufficient.