Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 22:06:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 22:06:33 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:20400 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 22:06:14 -0500 Subject: [OT] Thermal Take passive memory coolers (related to: VIA based motherboards) From: "Trever L. Adams" To: "Trever L. Adams" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1009508239.1440.0.camel@aurora> In-Reply-To: <1009508239.1440.0.camel@aurora> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 27 Dec 2001 22:06:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1009508773.1874.1.camel@aurora> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I read a review of these and put one on my system when I built the new one. However, I am wondering if this is the problem with my system mentioned in the above thread. I don't believe I damaged anything putting it on and I don't believe it is shorting anything out. As best as I can tell, the memory is NOT overheating. I DO NOT OVERCLOCK. I just put it on as a precaution. (I hate having hardware die because of heat.) Anyway, does anyone know if this is bad or good or just garbage? Trever - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/