Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-1826-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 07:33:37 +0800
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from
 struct gpio_desc
Message-ID: <ZXziUYicXaENTDk_@rigel>
References: <20231215023805.63289-1-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <20231215023805.63289-2-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <ZXyAQq7tVaOFI2Vs@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZXyAQq7tVaOFI2Vs@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:35:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:38:01AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > Store the debounce period for a requested line locally, rather than in
> > the debounce_period_us field in the gpiolib struct gpio_desc.
> >
> > Add a global tree of lines containing supplemental line information
> > to make the debounce period available to be reported by the
> > GPIO_V2_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL and the line change notifier.
>
> LGTM, a few minor comments below.
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
>
> (now you can have a kernel doc :-)
>

Maybe you can, but I can't.

> > + * a rbtree of the struct lines containing supplemental info.
> > + * Used to populate gpio_v2_line_info with cdev specific fields not contained
> > + * in the struct gpio_desc.
> > + * A line is determined to contain supplemental information by
> > + * line_is_supplemental().
> > + */
> > +static struct rb_root supinfo_tree = RB_ROOT;
> > +/* covers supinfo_tree */
> > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(supinfo_lock);
>
> Shouldn't this also be static?
>

Indeed.

> ...
>
> > +	guard(spinlock)(&supinfo_lock);
>
> + cleanup.h ?
>

Bah, I could've sworn I added that in, but it isn't evident in any of
the patches all the way back to v1, so apparently not.

> ...
>
> > +static void supinfo_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc,
> > +				struct gpio_v2_line_info *info)
> > +{
> > +	struct gpio_v2_line_attribute *attr;
> > +	struct line *line;
> > +
> > +	guard(spinlock)(&supinfo_lock);
> > +
> > +	line = supinfo_find(desc);
> > +	if (line) {
>
> 	if (!line)
> 		return;
>
> ?

Will do.

>
> > +		attr = &info->attrs[info->num_attrs];
> > +		attr->id = GPIO_V2_LINE_ATTR_ID_DEBOUNCE;
> > +		attr->debounce_period_us = READ_ONCE(line->debounce_period_us);
> > +		info->num_attrs++;
> > +	}
> > +}
>

Cheers,
Kent.

> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>