Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-3743-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:18:40 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Sanath S <sanaths2@amd.com>
Cc: Sanath S <Sanath.S@amd.com>, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	andreas.noever@gmail.com, michael.jamet@intel.com,
	YehezkelShB@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset
 downstream ports created by boot firmware
Message-ID: <20231218131840.GH1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <ff143967-63ff-c4fb-9c88-8537a663c45b@amd.com>
 <20231215115521.GW1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
 <c7d174d3-028f-9ce4-7ef5-3e033c195159@amd.com>
 <20231215140224.GX1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
 <866cb714-b9a8-a7d4-4c59-6ba771ef325f@amd.com>
 <20231218104234.GB1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
 <c433f29b-597c-b6d6-aa48-2b84a26dc623@amd.com>
 <20231218113151.GC1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
 <20231218122312.GE1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
 <997f2a94-66d9-fb95-8f75-46d61937f7e8@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <997f2a94-66d9-fb95-8f75-46d61937f7e8@amd.com>

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 06:35:13PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> 
> On 12/18/2023 5:53 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > > > The discover part should not do anything (like write the hardware) so
> > > > > perhaps it is just some timing thing (but that's weird too).
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think we should do something like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1. Disable all enabled protocol adapters (reset them to defaults).
> > > > > 2. Clear all protocol adapter paths.
> > > > > 3. Issue DPR over all enabled USB4 ports.
> > > > > 
> > > > > BTW, what you mean "didn't work"?
> > > > Path activation would go fine after DPR like below:
> > > > 
> > > > [   15.090905] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: 0:5 <-> 2:9 (PCI): activating
> > > > [   15.090932] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Down path from 0:5
> > > > to 2:9
> > > > [   15.091602] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Up path from 2:9 to
> > > > 0:5
> > > > 
> > > > But, PCIE enumeration doesn't happen (pcie link up will not happen, will not
> > > > see below logs)
> > > > [   15.134223] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
> > > > [   15.134243] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
> > > Okay, what if you like reset the PCIe adapter config spaces back to the
> > > defaults? Just as an experiment.
> > If this turns out to be really complex then I guess it is better to do
> > it like you did originally using discovery but at least it would be nice
> > to see what the end result of this experiment looks like :)
> 
> Yes, I'll give a try.
> As an experiment, I tried to compare the path deactivation that occurs at
> two place.
> 1. In tb_switch_reset where we are calling tb_path_deactivate_hop(port, i).
> 2. While we get a unplug event after doing DPR.
> 
> I observed both have different hop_index and port numbers.
> So, are we calling tb_path_deactivate_hop with wrong hop ids ?

Wrong adapters possibly.

> From deactivate tunnel (called while unplug) :
> [    3.408268] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: deactivating PCIe Down path from
> 2:9 to 0:5
> [    3.408282] deactivate hop port = 9 hop_index=8
> [    3.408328] deactivate hop port = 2 hop_index=10

Definitely should be port = 5 (that's PCIe down in your log) and
hop_index = 8 (that's the one used with PCIe).

> Deactivate from tb_switch_reset() :
> deactivate hop port = 5 hop_index=8

Can you add some more logging and provide me the dmesg or
alternativively investigate it yourself. You can use tb_port_dbg() to
get the port numbers to the log.