Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756619AbXLGWMi (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:12:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752282AbXLGWMa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:12:30 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:44830 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbXLGWM3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:12:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4759C548.6030304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:42:24 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala CC: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC References: <20071207211425.10223.91240.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20071207212817.GA391@lixom.net> <4759BCA2.1020809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <975B5B2B-C1F3-4021-9AE2-8873FFE1BDEC@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <975B5B2B-C1F3-4021-9AE2-8873FFE1BDEC@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1521 Lines: 45 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Olof Johansson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:44:25AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> >>>> Comments are as always welcome! >>> >>> Care to explain what this is useful for? (Not saying it's a stupid idea, >>> just wondering what the reason for doing it is). >>> >> >> In my case, I use it to test parts of my memory controller patches on an >> emulated NUMA machine. I plan to use it to test out page migration >> across nodes. > > Can you explain that further. I'm still not clear on why this is useful. > > - k Sure. In my case I need to emulate NUMA nodes to do some NUMA specific testing. The memory controller I've written has some interesting data structures like per node, per zone LRU lists. To be able to test those features on a non-numa box is a problem, since we get just the default node. To be able to test the memory controller under NUMA, I use fake NUMA nodes. x86-64 has a similar feature, the code I have here is the simplest I could come up with for PowerPC. I just thought of another very interesting use case, it can be used to split up the zone's lru lock which is highly contended. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/