Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757463AbXLGWRd (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:17:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756758AbXLGWRR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:17:17 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:33946 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756385AbXLGWRQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:17:16 -0500 Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, LKML Message-Id: <9AEDD952-7F20-471C-9A82-B6F3254BC869@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <4759C548.6030304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:15:54 -0600 References: <20071207211425.10223.91240.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20071207212817.GA391@lixom.net> <4759BCA2.1020809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <975B5B2B-C1F3-4021-9AE2-8873FFE1BDEC@kernel.crashing.org> <4759C548.6030304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1730 Lines: 52 On Dec 7, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Dec 7, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: >> >>> Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:44:25AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Comments are as always welcome! >>>> >>>> Care to explain what this is useful for? (Not saying it's a >>>> stupid idea, >>>> just wondering what the reason for doing it is). >>>> >>> >>> In my case, I use it to test parts of my memory controller patches >>> on an >>> emulated NUMA machine. I plan to use it to test out page migration >>> across nodes. >> >> Can you explain that further. I'm still not clear on why this is >> useful. >> >> - k > > Sure. In my case I need to emulate NUMA nodes to do some NUMA specific > testing. The memory controller I've written has some interesting data > structures like per node, per zone LRU lists. To be able to test those > features on a non-numa box is a problem, since we get just the > default node. Maybe I'm missing something, what do you mean by memory controller you've written? (I'm use to the term 'memory controller' meaning the actual RAM control). > To be able to test the memory controller under NUMA, I use fake NUMA > nodes. x86-64 has a similar feature, the code I have here is the > simplest I could come up with for PowerPC. > > I just thought of another very interesting use case, it can be used to > split up the zone's lru lock which is highly contended. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/