Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756073AbXLGWWg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:22:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753020AbXLGWW2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:22:28 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]:5341 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbXLGWW0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:22:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aXKEIwPnRZpuwJGvlwJgDIfJcyfwzfN7hFuqdpQOHihdduDhDFB/GFtgT6uDoyK1wPfzC5cntMkqymxSFOIq8cHPcBIen6/dvCcgz3WrZ1EITFXKa/F/6rdVkNv4ulVdcyYw+E+EcLMcAs9otS2S8/WRxeB6uQW/dMzFGVOqpqk= Message-ID: <43e72e890712071422j34ca2338xf98fda661f3c22fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:22:24 -0500 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Dave Young" Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org In-Reply-To: <20071207021258.GA12624@darkstar.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071207021258.GA12624@darkstar.lan> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4ef89c208b38a3f7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1210 Lines: 32 On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young wrote: > Hi, > > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some inline functions like this: > drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available > > fix it with adjust the order of inline function body. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Thanks Dave. What version of gcc were you using? I haven't run into this. BTW, nothing new was added in this patch, things were just shifted, but even that may be copyrightable. Is it fair to assume you are licensing these changes under the same license the file is in? For this file we'd usually use: Changes-licensed-under: 3-clause-BSD For future reference: http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#Changes-licensed-undertag Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/