Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-4527-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Message-ID: <28496d0b-87db-4bab-9853-2073d9ad4c8a@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:40:30 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: remove
 address/size-cells from mdss_dsi1
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <agross@kernel.org>,
        <andersson@kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <conor+dt@kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>
References: <20231207092801.7506-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <20231207092801.7506-4-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <9cf61b7b-199a-4535-a701-10851959b940@linaro.org>
 <e00b2c5a-cd79-40ed-b78b-0aa8c5b33fa0@quicinc.com>
 <c1d4f636-d068-48e0-9013-b5a586fff99f@linaro.org>
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1d4f636-d068-48e0-9013-b5a586fff99f@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


在 12/18/2023 6:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 18/12/2023 10:59, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 12/11/2023 6:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>> On 07/12/2023 10:27, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>> Address/size-cells will cause dtbs check warning, because mdss_dsi1 node
>>>> have not ranges and child also have not reg, so remove address/size-cells.
>>>
>>> Paste the excerpt of warning.
>> Sure, I will paste the excerpt of warning.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> I am not sure if this is correct. The address/size cells are there for
>>> panels. We have multiple of such warnings, so I would like to have here
>>> consensus for all of them.
>> Currently these address/size cells lead to dtc W=1 warning, so these
> 
> I know.
> 
>> should be dropped.
> 
> Why? They are correct.
> 
>> These can be re-added if needed at a later date.
> 
> Added where? These are rather properties of SoC.
> 
> This does not solve any of my concerns.
Hi Krzysztof,
Sorry, a new patch has been submitted to upstream before seeing your reply.
I will do more sync with internal teams, please ignore new patch series 
before we cannot solve your concerns.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan