Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-4621-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231115090735.2404866-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn> <15ba5868-42de-4563-9903-ccd0297e2075@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <15ba5868-42de-4563-9903-ccd0297e2075@infradead.org>
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:06:43 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H57PxrGPQMSvxUS2eJFCETYYUAyc=oxxu5fX1akuUCAng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Fix build due to API changes
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, 
	Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, 
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Xuerui Wang <kernel@xen0n.name>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, 
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Randy,

On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 1:08=E2=80=AFPM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org=
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Someone please merge this patch...
> Thanks.
I prepared loongarch-kvm changes for 6.8 and the base is 6.7-rc6 [1],
If I merge this patch then the loongarch-next branch will build fail.
So I think this patch should be merged to Paolo's next branch in his
kvm tree.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongs=
on.git/log/?h=3Dloongarch-next

Huacai

>
>
> On 11/15/23 01:07, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Commit 8569992d64b8f750e34b7858eac ("KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for
> > mmu_notifier_retry") replaces mmu_invalidate_retry_hva() usage with
> > mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn() for X86, LoongArch also need similar changes
> > to fix build.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> > ---
> >  arch/loongarch/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 80480df5f550..9463ebecd39b 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static bool fault_supports_huge_mapping(struct kvm_=
memory_slot *memslot,
> >   *
> >   * There are several ways to safely use this helper:
> >   *
> > - * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_hva() after grabbing the mapping level=
, before
> > + * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn() after grabbing the mapping level=
, before
> >   *   consuming it.  In this case, mmu_lock doesn't need to be held dur=
ing the
> >   *   lookup, but it does need to be held while checking the MMU notifi=
er.
> >   *
> > @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int kvm_map_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsi=
gned long gpa, bool write)
> >
> >       /* Check if an invalidation has taken place since we got pfn */
> >       spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > -     if (mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(kvm, mmu_seq, hva)) {
> > +     if (mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(kvm, mmu_seq, gfn)) {
> >               /*
> >                * This can happen when mappings are changed asynchronous=
ly, but
> >                * also synchronously if a COW is triggered by
>
> --
> #Randy
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
> https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html