DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from;
        b=Zym1acWqH/JIIbcIVSNdvF3/KBLpS6Kby2ktChoWJq7w+sfJJhKbk4xMjeNb143uizUdiw+/g80n2avDvvpX5E40UZH22oqd2K2xtZ9oCU4SQEY3mSm3PxlD9OP5KPUVJ5N6uDr9zdHLYVyBqoYvukgBVf2WNEEsh5mUJPpO22s=
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 02:33:59 +0300
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and excessive block IO errors
Message-ID: <20071207233359.GB1951@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
References: <1197060285.15428.20.camel@localhost> <20071207150537.2ccdd53e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071207150537.2ccdd53e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3540
Lines: 73

On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:05:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +0000
> Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> > I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already.  I read some
> > about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
> > 
> > On nearly all my USB block devices, I have been getting zillions of I/O
> > errors.  But they aren't real, they don't appear with 2.6.23 kernels.
> > 
> > I can often read and write data to the device, but these IO errors cause
> > error aborts in user space applications in many cases, making it a
> > chancy thing to run backup software, for example.
> > 
> > Here is a bit of dmesg from plugging in a perfectly good USB-2 flash
> > drive.
> > 
> > hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 6 chg 0000 evt 0004
> > ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: GetStatus port 2 status 001803 POWER sig=j CSC CONNECT
> > hub 3-0:1.0: port 2, status 0501, change 0001, 480 Mb/s
> > hub 3-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x501
> > ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: port 2 high speed
> > ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: GetStatus port 2 status 001005 POWER sig=se0 PE CONNECT
> > usb 3-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 9
> > ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: port 2 high speed
> > ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: GetStatus port 2 status 001005 POWER sig=se0 PE CONNECT
> > usb 3-2: default language 0x0409
> > usb 3-2: uevent
> > usb 3-2: usb_probe_device
> > usb 3-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> > usb 3-2: adding 3-2:1.0 (config #1, interface 0)
> > usb 3-2:1.0: uevent
> > libusual 3-2:1.0: usb_probe_interface
> > libusual 3-2:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id
> > usb-storage 3-2:1.0: usb_probe_interface
> > usb-storage 3-2:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id
> > scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
> > drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '009'
> > usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=05dc, idProduct=a400
> > usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
> > usb 3-2: Product: JUMPDRIVE
> > usb 3-2: Manufacturer: LEXAR MEDIA
> > usb 3-2: SerialNumber: 0A4EEC05201219080904
> > usb-storage: device found at 9
> > usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
> > usb-storage: device scan complete
> > scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access     LEXAR    JUMPDRIVE        1000 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] 2026592 512-byte hardware sectors (1038 MB)
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Write Protect is off
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Assuming drive cache: write through
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] 2026592 512-byte hardware sectors (1038 MB)
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Write Protect is off
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Assuming drive cache: write through
> >  sdg: sdg1
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Attached SCSI removable disk
> > sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg7 type 0
> > sd 4:0:0:0: [sdg] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > end_request: I/O error, dev sdg, sector 3984
> 
> Yes, this is breakage in the scsi tree.  I believe that the offending patch
> has been found and I have a nasty fix somewhere in my inbox - it involves
> reverting a patch which doesn't revert properly.  I haven't got onto
> looking at it yet, sorry.

Zan, check this thread http://marc.info/?t=119689824100001&r=1&w=2
for unholy details.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/