Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-4819-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <ff46b1a7-36ec-4ebd-9f48-2a5ae50a3180@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:42:14 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: remove
 address/size-cells from mdss_dsi1
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        <andersson@kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <conor+dt@kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>
References: <20231219003106.8663-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <20231219003106.8663-2-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <457e336e-004c-4721-b58d-e9ada16dc04b@linaro.org>
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <457e336e-004c-4721-b58d-e9ada16dc04b@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


在 12/19/2023 3:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 19/12/2023 01:31, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> The address/size-cells in mdss_dsi1 node have not ranges and child also
>> have not reg, then this leads to dtc W=1 warnings:
> 
> I cannot parse it. Address/size cells never have ranges or children.
> They cannot have. These are uint32 properties.
> 
>>
>>    sm8550.dtsi:2937.27-2992.6: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/display-subsystem@ae00000/dsi@ae96000:
>>      unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> I disagreed with the patch before. You resubmit it without really
> addressing my concerns.
> 
> I am not sure if this is correct fix and I want to fix all of such
> errors (there are multiple of them) in the same way. Feel free to
> propose common solution based on arguments.
> 
> I don't really want to NAKit but since you are resending without
> finishing the discussion, which is quite impolite, then let's be like that:
> 
> NAK
Hi Krzysztof,
Have sent this patch series before finding your latest comments in the 
previous patch series.
I sincerely apologize to you! This is my fault, please ignore this patch 
series before solve your concerns.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan