Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756861AbXLHCHf (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:07:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754450AbXLHCH1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:07:27 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43427 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753689AbXLHCH0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:07:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:07:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071207.180726.22868921.davem@davemloft.net> To: renzo@cs.unibo.it Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, cfriesen@nortel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AF_IPN: Inter Process Networking, try these... From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20071207211804.GA8293@cs.unibo.it> References: <20071206.224005.42816421.davem@davemloft.net> <20071207100322.GM20595@one.firstfloor.org> <20071207211804.GA8293@cs.unibo.it> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 753 Lines: 18 From: renzo@cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:18:05 +0100 > I disagree. If you suspect we would be better using IP multicast, I think > your suspects are not supported. > Try the following exercises, please.... Can you provide better solutions > without IPN? I personally have not purely advocated IP, although the performance differences UDP and AF_UNIX should be investigated. Instead I advocated using AF_NETLINK with some minor multicast permission modifications to suit your needs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/