Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756786AbXLHE54 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 23:57:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753768AbXLHE5q (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 23:57:46 -0500 Received: from [212.12.190.8] ([212.12.190.8]:35760 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751935AbXLHE5p (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 23:57:45 -0500 From: Al Boldi To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: git guidance Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 07:56:21 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Jakub Narebski , Andreas Ericsson , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Susi , Linus Torvalds , Jing Xue , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org References: <20071129105220.v40i22q4gw4cgoso@intranet.digizenstudio.com> <200712072204.48410.a1426z@gawab.com> <11272.1197056185@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <11272.1197056185@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712080756.21980.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1259 Lines: 33 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:04:48 +0300, Al Boldi said: > > Because WORKFLOW C is transparent, it won't affect other workflows. So > > you could still use your normal WORKFLOW B in addition to WORKFLOW C, > > gaining an additional level of version control detail at no extra cost > > other than the git-engine scratch repository overhead. > > > > BTW, is git efficient enough to handle WORKFLOW C? > > Imagine the number of commits a 'make clean; make' will do in a kernel > tree, as it commits all those .o files... :) .o files??? It probably goes without saying, that gitfs should have some basic configuration file to setup its transparent behaviour, and which would most probably contain an include / exclude file-filter mask, and probably other basic configuration options. But this is really secondary to the implementation, and the question remains whether git is efficient enough. IOW, how big is the git commit overhead as compared to a normal copy? Thanks! -- Al -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/