Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-5815-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231219-libstringheader-v4-0-aaeb26495d2f@google.com>
 <20231219-libstringheader-v4-1-aaeb26495d2f@google.com> <2023121938-stargazer-purse-0dc1@gregkh>
In-Reply-To: <2023121938-stargazer-purse-0dc1@gregkh>
From: Tanzir Hasan <tanzirh@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:35:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAE-cH4p-TzH3zyJfmSg3r=fw78j8y-0t0dp-NvaLyVYAMULw1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kernel.h: removed REPEAT_BYTE from kernel.h
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Nick DeSaulniers <nnn@google.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, 
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> Legal note, this file is NOT copyright Google as no Google employe
> actually wrote the logcal contents of it.
>
> Please be VERY careful when doing stuff like this, it has potentially
> big repercussions, and you don't want to have to talk to lots of
> lawyers a few years from now and explain how you messed it all up :(

Ah, sorry, I didn't realize. Will change right away.

> Nick, odds are there's a Google copyright class that Tanzir should take
> here, if not, I recommend the free LF one that anyone can take online
> that explains the issues here:
>         https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/open-source-licensing-basics-for-software-developers/

I will take a look, thanks!

> As-is, this change is STRONGLY Nacked by me.
>

Best,
Tanzir Hasan