Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d008:b0:f9:6acb:47ec with SMTP id bd8csp252933rdb; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:03:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrg24XeNRTuAF4gIPNmqYDlSVex7bgdQpVk64jTa84VljO/1cNKDYkBb5iL9fya0aeXsjn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec90:b0:1d3:e2d2:4d90 with SMTP id x16-20020a170902ec9000b001d3e2d24d90mr1776530plg.78.1703030589333; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:03:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1703030589; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DeTytj2fYWN3JkVAabTTorNmUToaVeGBjxxIoX7TMDkzVXl715gebSzPOQIfo8JU2R g/9Tkf1eoG4kykp6u+F/q2Q3zTKmTQDM54jvHhlaIAvJglyubdk/LcPbXPI8i1cU7AoG rJCWDnacEkloJDsvxh7/ObQH4hr6nsGmwHe/yfcrxbZap9AeZosB2ex2x8DFpJ4uOxpa EI7YXqjD2zUW2hOnjDencHRzqyAErVe8HTCCDzMpzvvnMiQEjUDr5hyVGMscaFtd2jxS IGliO3p9M83Ao+1+dd9Ipu8kq1uVP6mN4OT2NKLqhniIPXU0HDJn8AWrokN19V27qQD3 ShcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=mI203P3YTS2g8KlJZr3ogvzfFLEeaLSImTizxEpDFYQ=; fh=JnBfRCpNRG+Aqlg6a+l+9iDcot7MGpPVhYYDDAl4mp8=; b=PuIMUzJXfTJyijPJOwh5dbi0YFop1xTC0Jz/jmnItUYb5iIOrQan5xh/T2sQGL+nup bd3cMbJmRGramIh5G2XelWRfrPIxM/M74lrds7+ClqCh8PeodiSomN1GcKhZj0SDHLjM vq9JEKK/GUhSQKcTObZYYtXapjd4rw1UcE2VdYKuUvMyT/9+JvZkWnY1T/yJ/YE3cMo8 89ODaMxoPtk1IWoNV/wKNtHbw+xU/px8kwa6AwkcttgklW+7ZNnV4KB+qZN7RLNQy9XA yj3CLoRf12T4hVL1uzwhMIJgw4K2fn0vfs+l0CXeNUFRHHyTxYp3WqV/A60KtkATmDFJ gE5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lwn.net header.s=20201203 header.b=by8jg+z7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6125-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6125-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=lwn.net Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u16-20020a170902a61000b001d3df52d28bsi1669428plq.583.2023.12.19.16.03.09 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6125-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lwn.net header.s=20201203 header.b=by8jg+z7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6125-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6125-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=lwn.net Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03AAA2875B0 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7388C16; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="by8jg+z7" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C2D8BEB; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:7e19::646]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB5DA7DA; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BB5DA7DA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1703030579; bh=mI203P3YTS2g8KlJZr3ogvzfFLEeaLSImTizxEpDFYQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=by8jg+z7YbNuRtsxLjfaH0m7FfUuPb2n6RSW60HszKZEAPSDeSUkhghHsHTvXHgBr +osI/qgcH7nCEkMNVaRBMZXTpLROS6CmnX8MPlLULlUnCfpPn7c8se5bRHUwM/utB7 TfLF3h96vJg4MnEnGKpIM6gwSErLyPc6X+hz3EqBkPSWznGcCzKO+FixkTFEctHF90 fKaPiA918Qc6GNhBqSUxV6hwRZrlFWPjpNF4BFcqdyn81BpJjOeRbjZkrSxDt+bHbb ks/jp4bNB/tSB6mqB7U14BSce/bhI91R1oGnoouZi5MS0MMNGG53CMvH4/XwO5kLKh 4eretNHgjR1Gw== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the jc_docs tree In-Reply-To: <4cbcd213-55f9-4525-8be0-29db00a468d2@infradead.org> References: <20231218182825.39a6562b@canb.auug.org.au> <87r0jjmw59.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <4cbcd213-55f9-4525-8be0-29db00a468d2@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:02:59 -0700 Message-ID: <87le9pg2q4.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Randy Dunlap writes: > On 12/18/23 06:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After merging the jc_docs tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) >>> produced this warning: >>> >>> include/crypto/hash.h:248: warning: Excess struct member 'digestsize' description in 'shash_alg' >>> >>> and 636 new similar warnings :-( >>> >>> Exposed by commit >>> >>> b77fdd6a48e6 ("scripts/kernel-doc: restore warning for Excess struct/union") >>> >>> I am not sure what we should do about this ... last Friday I only >>> got about 18 lines of warnings. >> >> The warnings were expected, of course. >> >> The alternatives are to fix the docs or to revert b77fdd6a48e6, >> pretending that all those kerneldoc errors don't actually exist. The >> fixes should be pretty easy to do (and there's far less of them than it >> seems from the number of warnings). I can't get there right away but if >> nobody beats me to it I'll try to toss some patches together. > > Hi Jon, > > Attempt at a little coordination: > > It looks like you are working on some net-related patches for this. > I am currently working on fs/ and kernel/ patches. Oops...I did a few net ones now; they are all sent and I'm done for today. Thanks for working on these too! jon