Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753470AbXLHTlF (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:41:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751543AbXLHTkz (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:40:55 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:47051 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789AbXLHTky (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:40:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:40:42 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-ID: <20071208194042.GO17037@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier , Takashi Iwai References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071208014241.f4b138e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071208014241.f4b138e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2037 Lines: 46 On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:42:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Subject : snd_hda_intel 2.6.24-rc2 bug: interrupts don't always work on Lenovo X60s > > Submitter : Roland Dreier > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/8/255 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332 > > Handled-By : > > Patch : > > Takashi had a patch and that has been merged. AFAIK this regression > has been fixed and we're left with a new but harmless warning. > > However Roland reported other problems and it appears that the trail went > cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/14/251) > > Ted was hitting some of the same problems but that trail appears to also > have gone cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17). Actually, not gone cold, but I stopped posting about it because it's been solved and I thought agreement had been reached that it should be pushed to mainline before 2.6.25. I am very happily running with Ingo's "snd hda suspend latency: shorten codec read" patch, which was originally intended to speed up resuming from hibernation, but which as I discovered, also has the nice side effect of eliminating the reported error. On 11/23, Takashi replied to my note (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17) and suggested that Jaroslav push this patch to Linus immediately instead of waiting for 2.6.25, since it appearly solves two problems with one stone. However, I just checked, as of Linus's public, and Ingo's patch is *not* in mainline. However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in your regression list, and could we please get this patch pushed into mainline? Thanks!! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/