Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d008:b0:f9:6acb:47ec with SMTP id bd8csp411145rdb; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:10:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvRxgeqsIFXfMSTxxoQn0EoftvnR86LDHCk/2NxvqGR2XpCzk4Zw5pDplr6AzpKCERw3vp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:4982:b0:194:8912:88e with SMTP id ax2-20020a056a21498200b001948912088emr3246296pzc.32.1703059811141; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:10:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1703059811; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jQkVMrcx5Mr8AjMSB1RLui4wDPoF5+zHY33VKRXH1dROgWm8vh7iHbYcMXwICOjTZv rpF1VU7QtFWh/tGutsF4PP6Ctq829Re8Ub44vYRtAekMuDeoMPT1OCACNFv1mF4t/V8y FpCA6t6k4fJTAWDdT7W69F2MYSp8XqkmInKGaHZibc1UM89NOiS1P+okJM5cKIVyWzFv H+71h43+QFndOQ1uip/A/8QHKXBsUuSlgSqJE6F5GvsqRwXPUpA1pCjJly4EJYTv+9GD M2oioQBwIKxrvc/4dbMioafboYh6rci9GvU0nJSDSVXpyro9CSglNEnezIYMEy4hCkF9 XLDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=NF65fXwkqXQamuNafrRm0yY2EI1tOv2Q7ecU8wDlyyM=; fh=lQAcdeJTqusCo64zlo6XfS6jQpXURPg1euJJoTZtZgU=; b=T6fwJKXErI3YGFaKTRY7zERUXXl6kiZNhOHhL49L5kJjPDSOcOBSKiCxPjISis9F9n kE81xu9mUTjFt+3PmcbyMs0sMHgUKAdbpSN2c3cg+hQ3F4KwTLMpEuhGnn6zPJXaiwls 35ZuG1fk1f+y0WPw+tZ9Gr/rBKoN1UjX/Ig98uu6/kQhgUI6WJ4+Iv16pqM2UtUWeMN5 JByk9612n22rup+UnFzjDdiTqzUTN7P+WWCXEm2BCMNZLCoWO+4/uS0SVE5TLwhLpLzG 2ZKsa6wmgPxe4P4B/e0XCDdkM/2wHQiV3kJG0kpkQSMqC/N+RvZGIrg439R4AsY1Nsgq 1RKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=JCwELj+1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y189-20020a6364c6000000b005cdaa16ac20si3837252pgb.106.2023.12.20.00.10.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=JCwELj+1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37F72848A6 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5A61B297; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JCwELj+1" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324F81C69D; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F31DC433C8; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:10:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1703059801; bh=C/bmxBnTXGzZ1vjtmSYYuEX2ZVG/w7ytPsXTwf5j/S0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JCwELj+19lZxVgrIZLX+EQptxFmWECHHiOXtNEShl+yXmtQ0b+WmPOTg9wtRPwbOs sYowz0It0lgncI0jceH2ZJCij97kt/JqQyqOFH8kQSX82rLEL7Xg9vGHPZ7FqD4xA4 JZ5/DVFeDCU3wPBXTxWrM6VsJhCZYHxi6I8BLrjnLPISs6EKWkUfLKsJyGbRYH80Oo NDiJKGc4ppCPsCaXRtF1n0+Aje9IeaOwTmka7hp4BzeH601/DOyRbcIjj211Yy2ebO M0JJigKSK3z0FdXnsb5Owp9WprZQ8nCgFpbt/Hc113k+Y4STJPeZS7RhzvggCJPTIz AzzyCX0HU0knw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFreQ-0000nD-1l; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:09:59 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:09:58 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Marijn Suijten Cc: Lee Jones , phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Bjorn Andersson , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Konrad Dybcio , Martin Botka , Jami Kettunen , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Satya Priya Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: qcom-lpg: Add PM660L configuration and compatible Message-ID: References: <20220719211848.1653920-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org> <20220719211848.1653920-2-marijn.suijten@somainline.org> <3lsapoxlqijes5m4nqcbhdfhhs4chq3mcq3jaty7v2zihsqnwu@nn67a4h6425k> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 11:06:08AM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2023-12-19 10:33:25, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:17:16AM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > > > > Note that I have one more unmerged leds patch around, that hasn't been looked > > > at either. Would it help to send this once again, perhaps with more reviewers/ > > > testing (Johan, would you mind taking a look too)? > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220719213034.1664056-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/ > > > > Yes, I suggest you resend that one too so that it ends up in Lee's > > inbox. > > I will rebase, test and resend it too. Just asking if you notice any glaring > issues with this patch, as it won't be the first time it has been resent after > not being looked at for some time. I haven't look at this code before and only skimmed it now, but your patch looks correct to me. Johan