Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d008:b0:f9:6acb:47ec with SMTP id bd8csp414238rdb; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:17:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtjtkPFdqZE99fqhsiQCqLdiOddZqJDnEW2Gy6baWQP8dznCfwRamFMzX2gbKFXb8XFz1L X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5f49:0:b0:423:fe9f:353c with SMTP id y9-20020ac85f49000000b00423fe9f353cmr23733555qta.22.1703060260658; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:17:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1703060260; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WocomgCbP1aA3YzKa7gdaB88cVYPTJEdvJoe+MsKIxrf0kgfgUh9Vvb9e325wZy5ME vGkuMYJk5hRgllZOH7YmnwTmRjJDqwxZWA9DCH2c33066TEgEgCqc4cyCZ2ajusZEOcV 5GgeHdNmJ/aQTgdyviNOcysImNe2iH5RgvgDJKoJDfmRikYiadz98CD7CLcUey7jT8gl chELexer/Xx+2b0gVGG2VitxZ9oLcD2uYb+VVDR+6TiuooIBu+XFo/vVE45RWhKW3XOs FJd8U4XRTqiO70XfPM/8UsyKcWbhjFSdkBHxMJB5kqNwU/mZL+d9VwTsot3uzFbIhwp6 Qihw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe :list-id:precedence:dkim-signature; bh=8vOAyyVEVpa8qMFppzgoViL2yb2XDpzbKQHbzqyHCMU=; fh=MDQgSdnEJTMVdUi6dzxy5LAo6VAhufI5HwHCfiKZmak=; b=w2EHeySAeu043fU47oe9OVmn3MYiLX90NSvNnuyAn/y+vrExXBlFNGgUtsXWyz6FVl QXvSg5QuCH6T/GLb/64fpKTclFOR1n96ZpEO1hXoFD0qFprP6fDhg6Mqp40v/UK1YNB2 9woVp42+klvKQLXapLekQYsznjCTT1EqhjioSH3lO7uFfUgKky7Ug1TU6MlHKboaY3Ej x0FMn9sU2GrWrFDOA5F+Vlpteo0wUYYUjK5EoZeErFO4//Ow8sRMvaeHBRoFTS+c3Rz1 W1mY46HL1IpA5Wz5URsIJ0j/s1jwdE0wWuWjlzmiiZA4nEqtygMMBmMdz5UA4+wW4CBk qbUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=wF2rzoCU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6554-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6554-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2-20020a05622a118200b00423e09e72bdsi29814881qtk.695.2023.12.20.00.17.40 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6554-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=wF2rzoCU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6554-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6554-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488F11C20F7A for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0B01F19B; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="wF2rzoCU" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (mail-ed1-f42.google.com [209.85.208.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506521EA74 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-553e36acfbaso3051a12.0 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:17:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1703060248; x=1703665048; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8vOAyyVEVpa8qMFppzgoViL2yb2XDpzbKQHbzqyHCMU=; b=wF2rzoCUZlwec3XUfzEYbCUOeabbMheH+3t4cSNNsh4JLoqz9q7hvbDdshDtyrubJd hpcvcOhxp56ZJOlIslMVtIwP1PrRO31kxTZS0QiA7k2jENKpS60IQdA9NXabjrng+YrQ /fGLucrxh5Si1GspVaUf7jAV3zHgQU4uRLSfw3JPqAP/AoZ38J56SLqYnu9SQlyFDT7B JDQRtKPVWkk1tepFlmlQzEnFPgyxJ2wy1tfBhBEpuNSkr8x4cwlBEK9fk3LHqFeoILfO JIPVaXkwkoMw5EsLLv+cGbvWYzbWRhZTA/kFhsu9BiRgeYn8pHRxyxTdOnUJOzdI2M+k yK4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703060248; x=1703665048; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8vOAyyVEVpa8qMFppzgoViL2yb2XDpzbKQHbzqyHCMU=; b=lUSpRD/5b/BI8o/09z/3s49pdYJCxMr247OF1I4rXJbKNZzksrnDPiXcJb+i3EDSIG hg5SZyCOTcE6D+1sPTZwb3qoWdOOVn24pkP/z5DlQkORbnlXES2QDJifBOzd0akeT+LP n++6lLMv7Oqo8ttqQI+fIjjfuy5LuBUUYiUKm4TE7EwJJLDnL+xfYn9ttao4xDpPsmDH GflfYpmslO7WRGsrHChrr6qHzp/P7xF9zcoGTrjOHyFzUhc4M9li0nhPXEBaY4kOoKSU IKYgl6QVPU9JLF/qAUcK+3Z/9F5IC1wEv6mubsJoSk+gWWXqKo6vx9b2CElE12lb43Kg x3zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx3SRfmEAxZFHr2CVMXCAB21aKGufs2q2KnPl9KkEVePFSCxUj0 5MElJXxpyfKL9V+cguj/9MjZ7fg1Fi2yrv/2XTYZahiN/lBK X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3106:b0:553:ee95:2b4f with SMTP id dc6-20020a056402310600b00553ee952b4fmr22213edb.3.1703060248223; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:17:28 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231208061407.2125867-1-yuzhao@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Yu Zhao Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 01:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/4] mm/mglru: fix underprotected page cache To: Kairui Song Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Charan Teja Kalla , Kalesh Singh , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 11:38=E2=80=AFPM Yu Zhao wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 11:58=E2=80=AFAM Kairui Song w= rote: > > > > Yu Zhao =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8819=E6=97= =A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C 11:45=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 8:21=E2=80=AFPM Yu Zhao w= rote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:05=E2=80=AFAM Kairui Song wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yu Zhao =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8815= =E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=94 12:56=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:51:00PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:38=E2=80=AFAM Kairui Song wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yu Zhao =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C= =8814=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B 11:09=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:59:14AM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:03=E2=80=AFPM Kairui Song wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kairui Song =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B4= 12=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C 14:52=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yu Zhao =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B41= 2=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C 06:07=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:24=E2=80=AFAM Kairui Son= g wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yu Zhao =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9= =B412=E6=9C=888=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=94 14:14=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unmapped folios accessed through file descrip= tors can be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > underprotected. Those folios are added to the= oldest generation based > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. The fact that they are less costly to recl= aim (no need to walk the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rmap and flush the TLB) and have less impa= ct on performance (don't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cause major PFs and can be non-blocking if= needed again). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. The observation that they are likely to be= single-use. E.g., for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > client use cases like Android, its apps pa= rse configuration files > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and store the data in heap (anon); for ser= ver use cases like MySQL, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it reads from InnoDB files and holds the c= ached data for tables in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > buffer pools (anon). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, the oldest generation can be very sh= ort lived, and if so, it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't provide the PID controller with enoug= h time to respond to a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > surge of refaults. (Note that the PID control= ler uses weighted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refaults and those from evicted generations o= nly take a half of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole weight.) In other words, for a short li= ved generation, the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moving average smooths out the spike quickly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fix the problem: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. For folios that are already on LRU, if the= y can be beyond the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tracking range of tiers, i.e., five access= es through file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > descriptors, move them to the second oldes= t generation to give them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more time to age. (Note that tiers are use= d by the PID controller > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to statistically determine whether folios = accessed multiple times > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > through file descriptors are worth protect= ing.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. When adding unmapped folios to LRU, adjust= the placement of them so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that they are not too close to the tail. T= he effect of this is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Android, launching 55 apps sequentially: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before After = Change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > workingset_refault_anon 25641024 2559897= 2 0% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > workingset_refault_file 115016834 1061784= 38 -8% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks you for your amazing works on MGLRU. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe this is the similar issue I was tryin= g to resolve previously: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lwn.net/Articles/945266/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea is to use refault distance to decide i= f the page should be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > place in oldest generation or some other gen, w= hich per my test, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > worked very well, and we have been using refaul= t distance for MGLRU in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > multiple workloads. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are a few issues left in my previous RFC = series, like anon pages > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in MGLRU shouldn't be considered, I wanted to c= ollect feedback or test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cases, but unfortunately it seems didn't get to= o much attention > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upstream. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think both this patch and my previous series = are for solving the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > file pages underpertected issue, and I did a qu= ick test using this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > series, for mongodb test, refault distance seem= s still a better > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution (I'm not saying these two optimization= are mutually exclusive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though, just they do have some conflicts in imp= lementation and solving > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar problem): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Previous result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Execution Results after 905 seconds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------= ------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Executed Time (=C2=B5s= ) Rate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > STOCK_LEVEL 2542 27121571486.2= 0.09 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------= ------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TOTAL 2542 27121571486.2= 0.09 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Execution Results after 900 seconds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------= ------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Executed Time (=C2=B5s= ) Rate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > STOCK_LEVEL 1594 27061522574.4= 0.06 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------= ------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TOTAL 1594 27061522574.4= 0.06 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unpatched version is always around ~500. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the test results! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think there are a few points here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Refault distance make use of page shadow so i= t can better > > > > > > > > > > > > > > distinguish evicted pages of different access p= attern (re-access > > > > > > > > > > > > > > distance). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Throttled refault distance can help hold part= of workingset when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > memory is too small to hold the whole workingse= t. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So maybe part of this patch and the bits of pre= vious series can be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > combined to work better on this issue, how do y= ou think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to find some time this week to look at y= our RFC. It'd be a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm working on V4 of the RFC now, which just update s= ome comments, and > > > > > > > > > > > skip anon page re-activation in refault path for mglr= u which was not > > > > > > > > > > > very helpful, only some tiny adjustment. > > > > > > > > > > > And I found it easier to test with fio, using followi= ng test script: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > > > > > > > > swapoff -a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modprobe brd rd_nr=3D1 rd_size=3D16777216 > > > > > > > > > > > mkfs.ext4 /dev/ram0 > > > > > > > > > > > mount /dev/ram0 /mnt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark > > > > > > > > > > > cd /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > echo 4G > memory.max > > > > > > > > > > > echo $$ > cgroup.procs > > > > > > > > > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fio -name=3Dmglru --numjobs=3D12 --directory=3D/mnt -= -size=3D1024m \ > > > > > > > > > > > --buffered=3D1 --ioengine=3Dio_uring --iode= pth=3D128 \ > > > > > > > > > > > --iodepth_batch_submit=3D32 --iodepth_batch= _complete=3D32 \ > > > > > > > > > > > --rw=3Drandread --random_distribution=3Dzip= f:0.5 --norandommap \ > > > > > > > > > > > --time_based --ramp_time=3D5m --runtime=3D5= m --group_reporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > zipf:0.5 is used here to simulate a cached read with = slight bias > > > > > > > > > > > towards certain pages. > > > > > > > > > > > Unpatched 6.7-rc4: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D6548MiB/s (6866MB/s), 6548MiB/s-6548MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (6866MB/s-6866MB/s), io=3D1918GiB (2060GB), run=3D300= 001-300001msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patched with RFC v4: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D7270MiB/s (7623MB/s), 7270MiB/s-7270MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (7623MB/s-7623MB/s), io=3D2130GiB (2287GB), run=3D300= 001-300001msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patched with this series: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D7098MiB/s (7442MB/s), 7098MiB/s-7098MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (7442MB/s-7442MB/s), io=3D2079GiB (2233GB), run=3D300= 002-300002msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MGLRU off: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D6525MiB/s (6842MB/s), 6525MiB/s-6525MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (6842MB/s-6842MB/s), io=3D1912GiB (2052GB), run=3D300= 002-300002msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - If I change zipf:0.5 to random: > > > > > > > > > > > Unpatched 6.7-rc4: > > > > > > > > > > > Patched with this series: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D5975MiB/s (6265MB/s), 5975MiB/s-5975MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (6265MB/s-6265MB/s), io=3D1750GiB (1879GB), run=3D300= 002-300002msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patched with RFC v4: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D5987MiB/s (6278MB/s), 5987MiB/s-5987MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (6278MB/s-6278MB/s), io=3D1754GiB (1883GB), run=3D300= 001-300001msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patched with this series: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D5839MiB/s (6123MB/s), 5839MiB/s-5839MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (6123MB/s-6123MB/s), io=3D1711GiB (1837GB), run=3D300= 001-300001msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MGLRU off: > > > > > > > > > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > > > > > > > > > > > READ: bw=3D5689MiB/s (5965MB/s), 5689MiB/s-5689MiB= /s > > > > > > > > > > > (5965MB/s-5965MB/s), io=3D1667GiB (1790GB), run=3D300= 003-300003msec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fio uses ramdisk so LRU accuracy will have smaller im= pact. The Mongodb > > > > > > > > > > > test I provided before uses a SATA SSD so it will hav= e a much higher > > > > > > > > > > > impact. I'll provides a script to setup the test case= and run it, it's > > > > > > > > > > > more complex to setup than fio since involving settin= g up multiple > > > > > > > > > > > replicas and auth and hundreds of GB of test fixtures= , I'm currently > > > > > > > > > > > occupied by some other tasks but will try best to sen= d them out as > > > > > > > > > > > soon as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! Apparently your RFC did show better IOPS with b= oth access > > > > > > > > > > patterns, which was a surprise to me because it had hig= her refaults > > > > > > > > > > and usually higher refautls result in worse performance= . > > > > > > > > > > > > And thanks for providing the refaults I requested for -- your d= ata > > > > > > below confirms what I mentioned above: > > > > > > > > > > > > For fio: > > > > > > Your RFC This series Change > > > > > > workingset_refault_file 628192729 596790506 -5% > > > > > > IOPS 1862k 1830k -2% > > > > > > > > > > > > For MongoDB: > > > > > > Your RFC This series Change > > > > > > workingset_refault_anon 10512 35277 +30% > > > > > > workingset_refault_file 22751782 20335355 -11% > > > > > > total 22762294 20370632 -11% > > > > > > TPS 0.09 0.06 -33% > > > > > > > > > > > > For MongoDB, this series should be a big win (but apparently it= 's not), > > > > > > especially when using zram, since an anon refault should be a l= ot > > > > > > cheaper than a file refault. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, I'm baffled... > > > > > > > > > > > > One important detail I forgot to mention: based on your data fr= om > > > > > > lru_gen_full, I think there is another difference between our K= configs: > > > > > > > > > > > > Your Kconfig My Kconfig Max possible > > > > > > LRU_REFS_WIDTH 1 2 2 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yu, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info, my fault, I forgot to update my config as I = was > > > > > testing some other features. > > > > > Buf after I changed LRU_REFS_WIDTH to 2 by disabling IDLE_PAGE, t= hing > > > > > got much worse for MongoDB test: > > > > > > > > > > With LRU_REFS_WIDTH =3D=3D 2: > > > > > > > > > > This patch: > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > Execution Results after 919 seconds > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------= - > > > > > Executed Time (=C2=B5s) Rate > > > > > STOCK_LEVEL 488 27598136201.9 0.02 txn/s > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------= - > > > > > TOTAL 488 27598136201.9 0.02 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > memcg 86 /system.slice/docker-1c3a90be9f0a072f5719332419550cd0= e1455f2cd5863bc2780ca4d3f913ece5.scope > > > > > node 0 > > > > > 1 948187 0x 0x > > > > > 0 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 948187 0 6051788=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0r 0e 0p 1= 1916r > > > > > 66442e 0p > > > > > 1 0r 0e 0p = 903r > > > > > 16888e 0p > > > > > 2 0r 0e 0p = 459r > > > > > 9764e 0p > > > > > 3 0r 0e 0p = 0r > > > > > 0e 2874p > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 948187 1353160 6351=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 4 73045 23573 12=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0R 0T 0 349= 8607R > > > > > 4868605T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0R 0T 0 301= 2246R > > > > > 3270261T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0R 0T 0 249= 8608R > > > > > 2839104T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0R 0T 0 = 0R > > > > > 1983947T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1486579L 0O 1380614Y = 2945N > > > > > 2945F 2734A > > > > > > > > > > workingset_refault_anon 0 > > > > > workingset_refault_file 18130598 > > > > > > > > > > total used free shared buff/cac= he available > > > > > Mem: 31978 6705 312 20 249= 60 24786 > > > > > Swap: 31977 4 31973 > > > > > > > > > > RFC: > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > Execution Results after 908 seconds > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------= - > > > > > Executed Time (=C2=B5s) Rate > > > > > STOCK_LEVEL 2252 27159962888.2 0.08 txn/s > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------= - > > > > > TOTAL 2252 27159962888.2 0.08 txn/s > > > > > > > > > > workingset_refault_anon 22585 > > > > > workingset_refault_file 22715256 > > > > > > > > > > memcg 66 /system.slice/docker-0989446ff78106e32d3f400a0cf371c9= a703281bded86d6d6bb1af706ebb25da.scope > > > > > node 0 > > > > > 22 563007 2274 1198225=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0r 1e 0p = 0r > > > > > 697076e 0p > > > > > 1 0r 0e 0p = 0r > > > > > 0e 325661p > > > > > 2 0r 0e 0p = 0r > > > > > 0e 888728p > > > > > 3 0r 0e 0p = 0r > > > > > 0e 3602238p > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 23 532222 7525 4948747=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 24 500367 1214667 3292=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0 0 = 0 > > > > > 0 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 25 469692 40797 466=C2=B7 > > > > > 0 0R 271T 0 = 0R > > > > > 1162165T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 1 0R 0T 0 77= 4028R > > > > > 1205332T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 2 0R 0T 0 = 0R > > > > > 932484T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 3 0R 1T 0 = 0R > > > > > 4252158T 0=C2=B7 > > > > > 25178380L 156515O 23953602Y 5= 9234N > > > > > 49391F 48664A > > > > > > > > > > total used free shared buff/cac= he available > > > > > Mem: 31978 6968 338 5 246= 71 24555 > > > > > Swap: 31977 1533 30444 > > > > > > > > > > Using same mongodb config (a 3 replica cluster using the same con= fig): > > > > > { > > > > > "net": { > > > > > "bindIpAll": true, > > > > > "ipv6": false, > > > > > "maxIncomingConnections": 10000, > > > > > }, > > > > > "setParameter": { > > > > > "disabledSecureAllocatorDomains": "*" > > > > > }, > > > > > "replication": { > > > > > "oplogSizeMB": 10480, > > > > > "replSetName": "issa-tpcc_0" > > > > > }, > > > > > "security": { > > > > > "keyFile": "/data/db/keyfile" > > > > > }, > > > > > "storage": { > > > > > "dbPath": "/data/db/", > > > > > "syncPeriodSecs": 60, > > > > > "directoryPerDB": true, > > > > > "wiredTiger": { > > > > > "engineConfig": { > > > > > "cacheSizeGB": 5 > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > }, > > > > > "systemLog": { > > > > > "destination": "file", > > > > > "logAppend": true, > > > > > "logRotate": "rename", > > > > > "path": "/data/db/mongod.log", > > > > > "verbosity": 0 > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > The test environment have 32g memory and 16 core. > > > > > > > > > > Per my analyze, the access pattern for the mongodb test is that p= age > > > > > will be re-access long after it's evicted so PID controller won't > > > > > protect higher tier. That RFC will make use of the long existing > > > > > shadow to do feedback to PID/Gen so the result will be much bette= r. > > > > > Still need more adjusting though, will try to do a rebase on top = of > > > > > mm-unstable which includes your patch. > > > > > > > > > > I've no idea why the workingset_refault_* is higher in the better > > > > > case, this a clearly an IO bound workload, Memory and IO is busy = while > > > > > CPU is not full... > > > > > > > > > > I've uploaded my local reproducer here: > > > > > https://github.com/ryncsn/emm-test-project/tree/master/mongo-clus= ter > > > > > https://github.com/ryncsn/py-tpcc > > > > > > > > Thanks for the repos -- I'm trying them right now. Which MongoDB > > > > version did you use? setup.sh didn't seem to install it. > > > > > > > > Also do you have a QEMU image? It'd be a lot easier for me to > > > > duplicate the exact environment by looking into it. > > > > > > I ended up using docker.io/mongodb/mongodb-community-server:latest, > > > and it's not working: > > > > > > # docker exec -it mongo-r1 mongosh --eval \ > > > '"rs.initiate({ > > > _id: "issa-tpcc_0", > > > members: [ > > > {_id: 0, host: "mongo-r1"}, > > > {_id: 1, host: "mongo-r2"}, > > > {_id: 2, host: "mongo-r3"} > > > ] > > > })"' > > > Emulate Docker CLI using podman. Create /etc/containers/nodocker to q= uiet msg. > > > Error: can only create exec sessions on running containers: container > > > state improper > > > > Hi Yu, > > > > I've updated the test repo: > > https://github.com/ryncsn/emm-test-project/tree/master/mongo-cluster > > > > I've tested it on top of latest Fedora Cloud Image 39 and it worked > > well for me, the README now contains detailed and not hard to follow > > steps to reproduce this test. > > Thanks. I was following the instructions down to the letter and it > fell apart again at line 46 (./tpcc.py). I think you just broke it by https://github.com/ryncsn/py-tpcc/commit/7b9b380d636cb84faa5b11b5562e531f92= 4eeb7e (But it's also possible you actually wanted me to use this latest commit but forgot to account for it in your instructions.) > Were you able to successfully run the benchmark on a fresh VM by > following the instructions? If not, I'd appreciate it if you could do > so and document all the missing steps.