Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d002:b0:f9:9049:d2ea with SMTP id bd2csp37955rdb; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF4GQL/uvciDmpl/dAw8jKTFTksWoV/nDuW/1HE825kbRoFxFQaSmWzmdvdnrVcu9KyK8JO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:298f:b0:a00:aa23:34d0 with SMTP id x15-20020a170906298f00b00a00aa2334d0mr8425449eje.68.1703071181661; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1703071181; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nJzlLt9887ZL27ya02LGKOSzhLNRCm/xemy7sfH3lhKaYQxY2u7utRdYSDASAm/qdF i0MNZq2D7oPquEnXGYrXDfivCKOY9PyVCBFA60niWBQ0eFz73F3S9L6c2XA75kZhv+6C xT/hGNP9dhhL8B+oNYf7QIB8OIzYHkOSbInthpYx86sGprh625nWkWjpYDX9Ix//4Usj D80cjPmyuzt4X32mbjKYlh8npOD8W/I/u0UagwoLZzCz90CIeFfj3pc9FbYilSNfCC9I aNj29thc7TLYqdcKAQt01B73OZrD2dyvtjN6PVcWKV8enVLZuVGDIanYHn7AvtdROilK QLsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=53ALlqpQQBiJfMHSAH0XUy1XX9K4mSw/bFk5aEE1Ong=; fh=jDQNTk/4tp+rflvPKCGoHvA0wqGRRLns3NxQc/KmlLo=; b=jX7bByDt73zcF5iaFouRAQg0H96EvDYwSvP4KoeIY+fyRIGocQbNyPVNGQyoIiFoj1 051g7LAAb+Bhs4E6ASCfWm9SLXFpPkpoebSTHV509QYqK4YKWKO0u90sdsJgoCIru72W aDEVoEEcEp7KPQmc5jL144MpayiW4rhx49dst1Vl+Pcv/cV3e7CcOywa5CYUgmr/CNpF nnVcG+0rVH7nCFgnueKYrPPBH2Gv/wvISKVwPkKGPLz0L7xBL+Jfp2e2JtvRDyRYMozc QettUlg7M4KOGtSqEPj0gHg7RaVUY5/FGLiV/k+uAWGF3QCTe1L8H2PMo5JbPRtuPyyW GaWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=mXvlXXqV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6808-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6808-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2-20020a17090635c200b00a1d81bd5db5si11473886ejb.816.2023.12.20.03.19.41 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6808-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=mXvlXXqV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6808-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-6808-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1513C1F22C60 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0CB21365; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mXvlXXqV" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1212021345; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-54c7744a93fso6909816a12.2; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703071166; x=1703675966; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=53ALlqpQQBiJfMHSAH0XUy1XX9K4mSw/bFk5aEE1Ong=; b=mXvlXXqVKwH0k89OILyeM3LdObiCayuWQBYPeFyDAlj1bEg91FdZXcvyQe1AKCNNDu SyB1C4ZhpBscCU5wvx2UEP9QAtBMFDQ3Zcfnq3iUc37sjq+TL8KM0M1QS0PuE4+fi9go 6xZyS4oPFrfIONpFxmk/J9TyEWakjByj/yAJZkyN9vflKcaluhMGdZV5x9e4YMwNdIoX 3FOlA87xWcZV1gkw/HxcMJ/n3NMBFFAxaxBIbT/jLAo52Q4Whmu7i3HQQ6yM3dznLmD5 0Aa+OZsZcRj/ssFQjEySMXWZFNM8TuGz53VJyfZvL/iTzxBHX4bjdVQUbm2dPHl8xfqJ /QpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703071166; x=1703675966; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=53ALlqpQQBiJfMHSAH0XUy1XX9K4mSw/bFk5aEE1Ong=; b=ICyTng621Q4RKnA5PFTxfEGWrpproZfWEFW2/siknK5uK9TT+692kx+H56g4a39AKO C5TeEp0PAjolSvHYEpjAHanKTzMIQTIT89dzRLxyq0yEUuqSPe0iuuR6t1u9tvvGW7E8 zMncAeOy4S8ENCS1B0KDbtJwoLGcZxlg5ndpKKSS4SfuIygqGDww2Swoef19YA3y0Ybe rZMeR51LStxewyQYD13pEq3pAFdUeawHlem4HEEKKQ2IVlF2XvzSC1eXFHyFFRL+o9Cg KRcwqv5ZBOeLlhR/cEGSd0e6QRg1KgIVcPhHuWozzL5Wlwmhg2mSnuWHCvlSRHV2kBVI H6DQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzC+6b+b4hrMz+yicOfIMddd6j0VcY73ELpcm8TZhNizl3M8WJZ tcpUl0X+hhqUvS6db0hrv+s= X-Received: by 2002:a50:85cb:0:b0:551:9405:46a9 with SMTP id q11-20020a5085cb000000b00551940546a9mr6715587edh.30.1703071166078; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from tom-HP-ZBook-Fury-15-G7-Mobile-Workstation (net-188-217-59-229.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [188.217.59.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14-20020aa7cb8e000000b00552f2607d2asm4725986edt.96.2023.12.20.03.19.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:19:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:19:23 +0100 From: Tommaso Merciai To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: linuxfancy@googlegroups.com, martin.hecht@avnet.eu, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] media: i2c: alvium: removal of fr field Message-ID: References: <20231220085609.2595732-1-tomm.merciai@gmail.com> <20231220085609.2595732-3-tomm.merciai@gmail.com> <20231220091309.GG29638@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20231220100643.GJ29638@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231220100643.GJ29638@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Hi Laurent, Thanks for your comment. On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:06:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > Hi Laurent, > > Thanks for your review. > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:13:09AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hi Tommaso, > > > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > > > Use the imperative in the subject line: > > > > > > media: i2c: alvium: Remove the fr field of the alvium_dev structure > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > > > The fr (frame rate) field of the alvium_dev structure is > > > > only used to pass result from alvium_set_frame_interval() to > > > > alvium_set_frame_rate() that writes this info into the hw reg. > > > > Replace them with function parameter. > > > > > > Replace it with a function parameter. > > > > Thanks I'll fix this in v3. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai > > > > --- > > > > drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > > > > drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h | 1 - > > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c > > > > index 0dcd69bf9f92..a9ff6cc97cff 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c > > > > @@ -1185,19 +1185,19 @@ static int alvium_get_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium, > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int alvium_set_frame_rate(struct alvium_dev *alvium) > > > > +static int alvium_set_frame_rate(struct alvium_dev *alvium, u64 fr) > > > > { > > > > struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev; > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > ret = alvium_write_hshake(alvium, REG_BCRM_ACQUISITION_FRAME_RATE_RW, > > > > - alvium->fr); > > > > + fr); > > > > if (ret) { > > > > dev_err(dev, "Fail to set frame rate lanes reg\n"); > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - dev_dbg(dev, "set frame rate: %llu us\n", alvium->fr); > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "set frame rate: %llu us\n", fr); > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > @@ -1661,10 +1661,11 @@ static int alvium_g_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > > > > } > > > > > > > > static int alvium_set_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium, > > > > - struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi) > > > > + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi, > > > > + u64 *req_fr) > > > > { > > > > struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev; > > > > - u64 req_fr, dft_fr, min_fr, max_fr; > > > > + u64 dft_fr, min_fr, max_fr; > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > if (fi->interval.denominator == 0) > > > > @@ -1681,13 +1682,12 @@ static int alvium_set_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium, > > > > dev_dbg(dev, "fi->interval.denominator = %d\n", > > > > fi->interval.denominator); > > > > > > > > - req_fr = (u64)((fi->interval.denominator * USEC_PER_SEC) / > > > > + *req_fr = (u64)((fi->interval.denominator * USEC_PER_SEC) / > > > > fi->interval.numerator); > > > > > > > > - if (req_fr >= max_fr && req_fr <= min_fr) > > > > - req_fr = dft_fr; > > > > + if (*req_fr >= max_fr && *req_fr <= min_fr) > > > > + *req_fr = dft_fr; > > > > > > Shouldn't we clamp the value to [min, max] instead of using the default > > > if it's out of range ? Something like > > > > > > *req_fr = clamp(*req_fr, min_fr, max_fr) > > > > > > This makes me realize that the current code is wrong, req_fr can't be >= > > > max and <= min at the same time. You probably meant || instead of &&. > > > > > > This should be fixed in a separate patch. > > > > If this is ok for you, after this series I can put a patch with || fix > > instead of clamping, because if we clamp dft_fr is not used any more. > > After if you agree I will work on clamping. > > Thanks for the catch! :) > > It's fine to fix this on top of the series, but I don't see why you > would need to first use ||. You can call clamp() and remove dft_fr. I'm just thinking out loud eh :) Maybe in the future we need to expose fr infos to the user to play with that. But we are writing for now, then we can replan to readd dft_fr read later. I think this is what your are suggesting: +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c @@ -1171,12 +1171,10 @@ static int alvium_set_bayer_pattern(struct alvium_dev *alvium, } static int alvium_get_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium, - u64 *dft_fr, u64 *min_fr, u64 *max_fr) + u64 *min_fr, u64 *max_fr) { int ret = 0; - alvium_read(alvium, REG_BCRM_ACQUISITION_FRAME_RATE_RW, - dft_fr, &ret); alvium_read(alvium, REG_BCRM_ACQUISITION_FRAME_RATE_MIN_R, min_fr, &ret); alvium_read(alvium, REG_BCRM_ACQUISITION_FRAME_RATE_MAX_R, @@ -1647,7 +1645,7 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, { struct alvium_dev *alvium = sd_to_alvium(sd); struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev; - u64 req_fr, dft_fr, min_fr, max_fr; + u64 req_fr, min_fr, max_fr; struct v4l2_fract *interval; int ret; @@ -1657,7 +1655,7 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, if (fi->interval.denominator == 0) return -EINVAL; - ret = alvium_get_frame_interval(alvium, &dft_fr, &min_fr, &max_fr); + ret = alvium_get_frame_interval(alvium, &min_fr, &max_fr); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "Fail to get frame interval\n"); return ret; @@ -1670,9 +1668,7 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, req_fr = (u64)((fi->interval.denominator * USEC_PER_SEC) / fi->interval.numerator); - - if (req_fr >= max_fr && req_fr <= min_fr) - req_fr = dft_fr; + req_fr = clamp(req_fr, min_fr, max_fr); interval = v4l2_subdev_state_get_interval(sd_state, 0); right? Thanks again. Regards, Tommaso > > > > > > > > > - alvium->fr = req_fr; > > > > alvium->frame_interval.numerator = fi->interval.numerator; > > > > alvium->frame_interval.denominator = fi->interval.denominator; > > > > > > > > @@ -1699,6 +1699,7 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi) > > > > { > > > > struct alvium_dev *alvium = sd_to_alvium(sd); > > > > + u64 req_fr = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ; > > > > > > Do you need to initialize the variable ? It doesn't seem to be required. > > > > Really not, it's just to maintain the logic of alvium->fr. I will drop > > this in v3, thanks! > > > > > With these small issues fixed, > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > /* > > > > @@ -1711,9 +1712,9 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > > > > if (alvium->streaming) > > > > return -EBUSY; > > > > > > > > - ret = alvium_set_frame_interval(alvium, fi); > > > > + ret = alvium_set_frame_interval(alvium, fi, &req_fr); > > > > if (!ret) > > > > - ret = alvium_set_frame_rate(alvium); > > > > + ret = alvium_set_frame_rate(alvium, req_fr); > > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > @@ -2273,7 +2274,6 @@ static int alvium_subdev_init(struct alvium_dev *alvium) > > > > /* Setup initial frame interval*/ > > > > alvium->frame_interval.numerator = 1; > > > > alvium->frame_interval.denominator = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ; > > > > - alvium->fr = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ; > > > > > > > > /* Setup the initial mode */ > > > > alvium->mode.fmt = alvium_csi2_default_fmt; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h > > > > index 17f0bbbd1839..80066ac25047 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h > > > > @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ struct alvium_dev { > > > > > > > > struct alvium_mode mode; > > > > struct v4l2_fract frame_interval; > > > > - u64 fr; > > > > > > > > u8 h_sup_csi_lanes; > > > > u64 link_freq; > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart