Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-6885-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231220114225.26567-1-quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
 <20231220114225.26567-2-quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com> <d7ae374a-7269-4992-ad44-18b2516cad42@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <d7ae374a-7269-4992-ad44-18b2516cad42@linaro.org>
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:18:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppYuXpqKpTcUda1LBFfBmm40-VpC+3heJqoL82kS=+erA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Enable various remoteprocs
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 20/12/2023 12:42, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> > Enable the ADSP, CDSP, MPSS and WPSS that are found on the SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> > index 03e97e27d16d..ad78efa9197d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> > @@ -419,6 +419,26 @@ &qupv3_id_0 {
> >       status = "okay";
> >  };
> >
> > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > +     firmware-name = "qcom/qcm6490/adsp.mdt";
>
> Why MDT not MBN?

I agree here. NAK until this is .mbn. Please follow the example of
other boards when you write patches.

>
> I don't see these files in linux-firmware and your cover letter did not
> explain anything around their submission. What's the status on that part?

This isn't usually required, is it? I mean, the firmware can come from
linux-firmware, from the device partition or in any other way. With
the FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER this becomes just the key string used to
identify firmware to be loaded.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry