Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-7005-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:58:02 +0000
Message-ID: <87zfy5t1qt.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@gmail.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	wchen <waylingii@gmail.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Minda Chen <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: selftests: Enable tunning of err_margin_us in arch timer test
In-Reply-To: <CAJve8ona7g=LxW1YeRB_FqGodF973H=A3b2m8054gmzK=Z7_ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1702371136.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
	<0343a9e4bfa8011fbb6bca0286cee7eab1f17d5d.1702371136.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
	<8734vy832j.wl-maz@kernel.org>
	<CAJve8onc0WN5g98aOVBmJx15wFBAqfBKJ+ufoLY+oqYyVL+=3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<f98879dc24f948f7a8a7b5374a32bc04@kernel.org>
	<CAJve8ona7g=LxW1YeRB_FqGodF973H=A3b2m8054gmzK=Z7_ww@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.2
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:51:24 +0000,
Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:00=E2=80=AFPM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wro=
te:
> >
> > On 2023-12-20 06:50, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:22=E2=80=AFAM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>=
 wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:31:20 +0000,
> > >> Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h b/to=
ols/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > index 968257b893a7..b1d405e7157d 100644
> > >> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct test_args {
> > >> >       int nr_iter;
> > >> >       int timer_period_ms;
> > >> >       int migration_freq_ms;
> > >> > +     int timer_err_margin_us;
> > >>
> > >> ... except that you are storing it as a signed value. Some consisten=
cy
> > >> wouldn't hurt, really, and would avoid issues when passing large
> > >> values.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, it's more proper to use an unsigned int for the non-negative err=
or
> > > margin.
> > > Storing as signed here is just to keep the type consistent with that
> > > of timer_period_ms
> > > since there will be '+' operation in other places.
> > >
> > >         tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
> > >         /* Setup a timeout for the interrupt to arrive */
> > >          udelay(msecs_to_usecs(test_args.timer_period_ms) +
> > >              test_args.timer_err_margin_us);
> >
> > But that's exactly why using a signed quantity is wrong.
> > What does it mean to have a huge *negative* margin?
> >
>=20
> Hi Marc,
>=20
> I agree that negative values are meaningless for the margin.
> If I understand correctly, the negative margin should be filtered by
> assertion in atoi_non_negative().

No. Please.

atoi_non_negative() returns a uint32_t, which is what it should do.
The bug is squarely in the use of an 'int' to store such value, and it
is the *storage* that turns a positive value into a negative one.

	M.

--=20
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.