Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754374AbXLICP4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753268AbXLICPt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:49 -0500 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:34859 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751990AbXLICPt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-ID: <20071209021544.GY17037@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier , Takashi Iwai References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071208014241.f4b138e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071208194042.GO17037@thunk.org> <200712082330.54259.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712082330.54259.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1081 Lines: 24 On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > your regression list, > > Done, thanks. Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference (although I guess it's less efficient). Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/