Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-7707-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 01:40:04 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: "wsa@kernel.org" <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"gregory.clement@bootlin.com" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add bus-reset-gpios property
Message-ID: <20231221004004.dwmzzwzvh53po6ai@zenone.zhora.eu>
References: <20231115035753.925534-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <20231115035753.925534-2-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <f24b9b2d-aeb1-47f7-bf21-4383fdcf94aa@linaro.org>
 <5a52b0c9-8858-4f55-8dd7-9269c29c10a7@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <ZYHMvZ3plIQ0zXWa@shikoro>
 <601d07b5-264d-4322-b92e-63d58b3d69fa@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <ZYICEczlao+pg8kd@shikoro>
 <20231219232545.ksrxgvl7epeewga2@zenone.zhora.eu>
 <e80a06aa-bb44-4993-8e67-dbc910a409ab@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e80a06aa-bb44-4993-8e67-dbc910a409ab@linaro.org>

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:22:38AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 00:25, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are 
> >>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to 
> >>> offer as an alternative.
> >>
> >> I see. Thanks for the heads up!
> > 
> > I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take
> > time.
> 
> NAK
> 
> If you intend to merge it, then please carry:
> 
> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

ehehe... too much drama here :-)

I know you nacked this patch and of course won't be taken
anywhere.

I was actually referring to Chris previous patch rather than this
one.

Andi

> The patchset is wrong and made of wrong reasons. It claimed GPIO cannot
> be shared, which is simply not true.
> 
> > 
> > Myself I have developed a prototype for what has been discussed
> > with Krzysztof, but I don't know how much time it will take to
> > get things done.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>