Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-7796-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <f31dae39-7c62-453a-8ca5-bd0b0e58769f@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:11:34 -0700
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20231221135602.12bf82f5@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20231221135602.12bf82f5@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper")
>   253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())")
>   372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work")
>   4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()")
>   7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open")
>   a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g")
>   eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()")

Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be
the case. Christian?

-- 
Jens Axboe