Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:16:05 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?
Message-ID: <20071209161605.GX19691@waste.org>
References: <20071204114125.GA17310@torres.zugschlus.de> <20071204161811.GB15974@stusta.de> <20071204164720.6e4dc2c4@the-village.bc.nu> <475599D6.4030008@cosmosbay.com> <20071205212646.GP17536@waste.org> <20071209124200.GA31147@torres.zugschlus.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071209124200.GA31147@torres.zugschlus.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 800
Lines: 18

On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:42:00PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:26:47PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The distinction between /dev/random and /dev/urandom boils down to one
> > word: paranoia. If you are not paranoid enough to mistrust your
> > network, then /dev/random IS NOT FOR YOU. Use /dev/urandom.
> 
> But currently, people who use /dev/urandom to obtain low-quality
> entropy do a DoS for the paranoid people.

Not true, as I've already pointed out in this thread.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/