Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-8416-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:58:01 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>, Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@asem.it>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
Message-ID: <20231221125801.GG10102@google.com>
References: <20231221165805.0c4771c1@canb.auug.org.au>
 <170316329164.542553.8341559295114557258.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <170316329164.542553.8341559295114557258.b4-ty@kernel.org>

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:58:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the backlight tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c: In function 'mp3309c_bl_update_status':
> > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c:134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_apply_state'; did you mean 'pwm_apply_args'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   134 |                 ret = pwm_apply_state(chip->pwmd, &pwmstate);
> >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >       |                       pwm_apply_args
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
>       commit: f7baa9ccef93ba1c36a8ecf58c2f4e86fb3181b9

Actually it's:

  f7baa9ccef93b ("backlight: mp3309c: Rename  pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()")

But don't bank on the commit ID staying the same.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]