Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-8815-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <4b2fbac42345acb21ac2bdfe6abd4fb4a00bb8c6.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: initialize cancellations earlier
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa
	 <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:10:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <2023122129-seclusion-qualm-3084@gregkh>
References: 
	<20231221150444.1e47a0377f80.If7e8ba721ba2956f12c6e8405e7d61e154aa7ae7@changeid>
	 <2023122129-seclusion-qualm-3084@gregkh>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39) 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 18:05 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:04:45PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> >=20
> > Tetsuo Handa pointed out that in the (now reverted)
> > lockdep commit I initialized the data too late.
>=20
> As the patch isn't in any tree, what is this against?

Hm? You mean the lockdep patch? It's not relevant, but I then
continued and wrote:

> > The same is true for the cancellation data, [...]

and then the patch goes and changes the cancellation data
initialization?

Or do you mean the patch mentioned in the fixes?

> > Fixes: 8c88a474357e ("debugfs: add API to allow debugfs operations canc=
ellation")

That *is* in Linus's tree, as of -rc4.

Not sure I understand the question.

johannes