Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-8835-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:17:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: initialize cancellations earlier
Message-ID: <2023122129-distress-sanding-8449@gregkh>
References: <20231221150444.1e47a0377f80.If7e8ba721ba2956f12c6e8405e7d61e154aa7ae7@changeid>
 <2023122129-seclusion-qualm-3084@gregkh>
 <4b2fbac42345acb21ac2bdfe6abd4fb4a00bb8c6.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4b2fbac42345acb21ac2bdfe6abd4fb4a00bb8c6.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 18:05 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:04:45PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Tetsuo Handa pointed out that in the (now reverted)
> > > lockdep commit I initialized the data too late.
> > 
> > As the patch isn't in any tree, what is this against?
> 
> Hm? You mean the lockdep patch? It's not relevant, but I then
> continued and wrote:
> 
> > > The same is true for the cancellation data, [...]
> 
> and then the patch goes and changes the cancellation data
> initialization?
> 
> Or do you mean the patch mentioned in the fixes?
> 
> > > Fixes: 8c88a474357e ("debugfs: add API to allow debugfs operations cancellation")
> 
> That *is* in Linus's tree, as of -rc4.
> 
> Not sure I understand the question.

But this doesn't apply against Linus's tree, or my driver-core-next
branch now, where should it go?

still confused,

greg k-h