Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-8899-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1842328.1703171371@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1842328.1703171371@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:01:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjJtcyi=oRf7Rtf2RueWq_336KEsSf9b-BKPxRcHHQx+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: Fix overwriting of result of DNS query
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>, 
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 07:09, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Could you apply this fix, please?

Ok, so this is just *annoying*.

Why did you send me this as a patch, and then *twenty minutes* later
you send me an AFS pull request that does *not* include this patch?

WTF?

I've applied this, but I'm really annoyed, because it really feels
like you went out of your way to just generate unnecessary noise and
pointless workflow churn.

It's not even like the pull request contained anything different. The
patch _and_ the pull request were both not just about AFS, but about
DNS issues in AFS.

Get your act together.

                    Linus