Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-9733-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:48:21 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
	Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] device property: Modify fwnode irq_get() to use
 resource
Message-ID: <ZYWFlYlDimdP2S2A@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231220235459.2965548-1-markhas@chromium.org>
 <20231220165423.v2.20.I38ac58ab04985a404ed6551eb5813fa7841ef410@changeid>
 <ZYQVdE4esAZbtMrn@kekkonen.localdomain>
 <CANg-bXCshpg5=rRiaxbjdEeD3VNsdV-cKxu-nCqT7K_f8wJodA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANg-bXCshpg5=rRiaxbjdEeD3VNsdV-cKxu-nCqT7K_f8wJodA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:52:15PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> > Both acpi_irq_get() and of_irq_to_resourece() use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> > instead. I don't see why fwnode_irq_get_resource() shouldn't do the same.
> >
> > With this changed,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > In fact this should have always been the case for fwnode_irq_get(). I
> > wouldn't mind changing that, too, in a separate patch.
> 
> Sure. It looks like fwnode_iomap(), fwnode_irq_get(),
> fwnode_irq_get_byname(), and fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint() could all
> be updated. I'll add another patch with these changes unless there's a
> reason some of those functions shouldn't be GPL'd?

Interesting... Once should look at the history of those changes.
I don't think anything prevents us from moving to GPLed versions.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko