Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-9767-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231221175527.2814506-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <ZYTihbWMcHMHSkC_@rigel> <ZYWDij-J1YruTIM7@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZYWHjq_7PnwO27ro@rigel> <CAMRc=McPzQyR1J5Mhn7_cBrWEcqz2JKg7t8CpjHx6jgVEnYBvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZYWYZ6Ys3hSb4IOe@rigel>
In-Reply-To: <ZYWYZ6Ys3hSb4IOe@rigel>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:09:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CACMJSeu-bS+MpP8HCcD74w0j6vFt821bpgth5LHpqq-fHnEe1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce_period()
 and use
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, 
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 15:08, Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:56=E2=80=AFPM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
> > >
>
> > > > > And you could've included me in the Cc so I didn't just find it b=
y
> > > > > accident.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it's time to add you to the MAINTAINERS for this file as a de=
signated
> > > > reviewer?
> > > >
> > >
> > > You are patching my recent change that you yourself reviewed only day=
s
> > > ago. I would think that you would Cc me whether I were a maintainer o=
r
> > > not as I'm very likely to have relevant feedback.
> >
> > On that note: do you see yourself as a full GPIO reviewer or do you
> > prefer I split out the uAPI part into a separate section in
> > MAINTAINERS and nominate you as its maintainer?
> >
>
> Not sure I'm comfortable with either.
>
> Definitely not full GPIO.  I don't feel sufficiently familiar with GPIO
> and the related subsystems to qualify.
>
> Splitting out cdev and the uAPI makes more sense to me, but in my mind at
> least even that requires a level of commitment higher than the rather
> spotty attention I've been providing recently.
> I'm more inclined to leave it as is.
>

I can still split the uAPI files into their own section, make Linus
and myself maintainers and make you a reviewer, how about that?

Bart

> Cheers,
> Kent.