Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-9770-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:12:21 +0800
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: andy@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gpiolib: cdev: replace locking wrappers for
 gpio_device with guards
Message-ID: <ZYWZRWvwBTdKNHF-@rigel>
References: <20231221012040.17763-1-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <20231221012040.17763-6-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <ZYReZI_TnX1MyvP7@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZYTcn-UX0TUM5P9O@rigel>
 <CAMRc=MfNme1VavLNnX9whjgohNCs4Q5qADByX8c_tdw05UVYUA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MfNme1VavLNnX9whjgohNCs4Q5qADByX8c_tdw05UVYUA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 03:05:41PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:47 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:20:40AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > > Replace the wrapping functions that inhibit removal of the gpio chip
> > >
> > > GPIO
> > >
> >
> > Bart, I don't care either way and not enough to respin a v3.
> > If it bothers you could you fix it on the way in?
> >
>
> Sure!
>
> > That is if you aren't too busy reversing xmas trees ;-).
> >
>
> Joke's on you, I actually do find them easier to read and try to use
> them everywhere in new code I write. :)
>

Oh, I agree - it is more readable.  It just seems very timely that Andy
keeps griping about them not being inverted.

Cheers,
Kent.