Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-9854-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:19:18 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, mani@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	beanhuo@micron.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, junwoo80.lee@samsung.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
	"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-qmp-ufs: Rectify SM8550
 UFS HS-G4 PHY Settings
Message-ID: <ZYWv_rmgLN3NuyY2@matsya>
References: <1701520577-31163-1-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com>
 <1701520577-31163-10-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com>
 <ZYRyJU9klhZzLdni@matsya>
 <ad95e193-1216-46ae-9f7d-2967a24d7a12@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ad95e193-1216-46ae-9f7d-2967a24d7a12@quicinc.com>

On 22-12-23, 15:41, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On 12/22/2023 1:13 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 02-12-23, 04:36, Can Guo wrote:
> > > The registers, which are being touched in current SM8550 UFS PHY settings,
> > > and the values being programmed are mainly the ones working for HS-G4 mode,
> > > meanwhile, there are also a few ones somehow taken from HS-G5 PHY settings.
> > > However, even consider HS-G4 mode only, some of them are incorrect and some
> > > are missing. Rectify the HS-G4 PHY settings by strictly aligning with the
> > > SM8550 UFS PHY Hardware Programming Guide suggested HS-G4 PHY settings.
> > 
> > This fails for me, as I have picked Abels offset series, can you please
> > rebase these two patches and send
> > 
> In v8, I rebased the two changes to linux-next. Is the ask there to rebase
> the two changes to phy/next?

Yes these two failed to apply for me, pls rebase and post

-- 
~Vinod