Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-9980-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:46:56 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl
 protocol
Message-ID: <ZYXLkIPG3QFY89RY@pluto>
References: <20231215-pinctrl-scmi-v1-0-0fe35e4611f7@nxp.com>
 <20231215-pinctrl-scmi-v1-4-0fe35e4611f7@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231215-pinctrl-scmi-v1-4-0fe35e4611f7@nxp.com>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 07:56:32PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Add SCMI v3.2 pinctrl protocol bindings and example.
> 

Hi

as I mentioned on the last patch review, I dont see adding all this
vendor specific stuff in the ARM SCMI Pinctrl generic binding as a
viable option, nor the per-protocol compatible to select slightly
different behaviours.

Thanks,
Cristian