Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-10073-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <6586096d.df0a0220.1a02f.6ace@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 23:09:21 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document new LEDs
 polarity property
References: <20231215212244.1658-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20231215212244.1658-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20231220152209.GA229412-robh@kernel.org>
 <42ddbe25-8acd-4959-ae84-269e943f7c84@lunn.ch>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42ddbe25-8acd-4959-ae84-269e943f7c84@lunn.ch>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I do worry this continues to evolve until we've re-created the pinctrl 
> > binding...
> 
> Hi Rob
> 
> What is you opinion of the pinctrl binding? Should we just copy parts
> of it?
>

Hi,

I have the new series ready but I'm not sure pincfg-node have useful
property.

What we should use from there? From what I can see only output-low would
be useful to us. I didn't find a way to handle the inactive mode.

Should I send the new series so we can continue the discussion there or
better to wait for Rob feedback?

-- 
	Ansuel