Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753379AbXLJI1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751036AbXLJI1m (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:27:42 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:54902 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177AbXLJI1l (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:27:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R9WvU6R7Rgv+LLpbRmwXwqwrZ+Nqv2zACjqV+r93FjljGVDBTQsNRwKe5qVLbzJmOhktUZgugD+lVzzIWQ5/n/01XwZfSNVn8XpT440HajqCNulw4tyFMB+fkmLrBNB8Sg3Ulkfp9OTb8rJNQ+AoJy1PX95SGf5MtGOTcW8UVzQ= Message-ID: <475CF861.5080804@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:27:13 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071208015227.3a1c7fae.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <475B9270.6070902@gmail.com> <20071209134217.7ff02dd2@the-village.bc.nu> <20071209220132.53268368@the-village.bc.nu> <20071210082157.GA21564@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071210082157.GA21564@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 29 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Tejun already reported that this apparently gets fixed _properly_ with >> the more extensive cleanups and fixes that are pending for 2.6.25. > > btw., how extensive are those cleanups and fixes in reality, is there a > rollup somewhere one could take a look at? Those fixes and cleanups were > deferred to v2.6.25 in the knowledge of having the current code included > in v2.6.24 - but now that the current approach seems to regress, maybe > those cleanups are still safe enough. (compared to an outright revert) The following git tree contains patches pending review for 2.6.25. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git;a=shortlog;h=improve-ATAPI-data-transfer-no-pio And we're getting close to fixing the regression. I don't think there's too much worry about this one. Just need a bit more time to test few more things. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/