Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756645AbXLJN1W (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:27:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755883AbXLJN1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:27:06 -0500 Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org ([194.74.144.162]:52936 "EHLO ftp.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755594AbXLJN1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:27:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:26:35 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yoichi Yuasa , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources Message-ID: <20071210132635.GA12913@linux-mips.org> References: <200710122305.l9CN5tFI008240@hera.kernel.org> <1196899818.7033.11.camel@pasglop> <200712060434.lB64YUtc023934@po-mbox305.hop.2iij.net> <1196917447.7033.17.camel@pasglop> <200712060558.lB65wAFu016256@po-mbox304.hop.2iij.net> <1196922262.7033.33.camel@pasglop> <20071209021231.GA13729@linux-mips.org> <1197185091.6572.38.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1197185091.6572.38.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1167 Lines: 25 On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:24:51PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > If that is the case though (that is it can't issue low ioport cycles), > how would have the fd6e7321... worked in the first place ? Hrm... > strange. My understanding is that all that patch does is put junk in the > pci_dev resource structures :-) Maybe that's enough to cause the PCI > layer later on to be unhappy about them and reassign the BARs to some > place that works ? In which case, you are right, a better approach is a > quirk on this specific platform, or even better, mark 0...0x10000000 > busy in ioport_resources and let the generic code clash & re-assign... > > I must admit I'm a bit confused tho... > > Anyway, so far, nobody is arguing in favor of keeping this patch in nor > so far trying and explanation on why it wouldn't be totally bogus, so I > suggest we revert it :-) I certainly don't oppose at this point. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/